fs/f2fs/data.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Syzbot reports a recurrence of the kernel BUG in f2fs_write_end_io:
kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:388!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 15 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 PREEMPT_{RT,(full)}
RIP: 0010:f2fs_write_end_io+0x16df/0x1740
Call Trace:
blk_update_request+0x57e/0xe60
blk_mq_end_request+0x3e/0x70
blk_done_softirq+0x10a/0x160
handle_softirqs+0x1de/0x6d0
run_ksoftirqd+0x52/0x180
Commit 50ac3ecd8e05 ("f2fs: fix to do sanity check on node footer
in {read,write}_end_io") added f2fs_sanity_check_node_footer() to
both end_io paths to catch corrupted node footers reachable from
fuzzed on-disk images. In f2fs_write_end_io(), however, the
existing
f2fs_bug_on(sbi, folio->index != nid_of_node(folio));
was left in place immediately after the new helper call. The
helper detects the mismatch, sets SBI_NEED_FSCK and emits a
ratelimited warning, but its return value is discarded and the
following f2fs_bug_on() panics on the exact same condition.
Tracing the reproducer confirms the failure path. A node folio
with index=11 is looked up via __get_node_folio(), the
synchronous sanity check at page_hit fails with -EFSCORRUPTED
and out_err clears uptodate but leaves the dirty bit set from
the folio's earlier lifecycle. A subsequent read_node_folio()
fails with the same error (footer_nid=0, ino=0), and
folio_end_read(folio, false) does not clear dirty either. The
writeback iterator then finds the still-dirty folio via the
PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY tag and submits it. f2fs_write_end_io()
observes folio->index=11 with nid_of_node(folio)=0 and panics
from softirq context via blk_done_softirq, even though
f2fs_sanity_check_node_footer() has already correctly identified
the corruption and would have signalled it via its return value.
A filesystem inconsistency reachable from a mounted image must
not panic the kernel. Mirror the handling already used in
f2fs_finish_read_bio(): capture the helper's return value and
mark the bio with BLK_STS_IOERR on mismatch instead of issuing
BUG_ON. SBI_NEED_FSCK is set by the helper, so fsck.f2fs will
repair the inconsistency on the next mount.
Reported-by: syzbot+4af46ee83100e99bce09@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4af46ee83100e99bce09
Fixes: 50ac3ecd8e05 ("f2fs: fix to do sanity check on node footer in {read,write}_end_io")
Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
---
fs/f2fs/data.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index 8d4f1e75dee3..c149b0ccf22d 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -382,11 +382,11 @@ static void f2fs_write_end_io(struct bio *bio)
STOP_CP_REASON_WRITE_FAIL);
}
- if (is_node_folio(folio)) {
- f2fs_sanity_check_node_footer(sbi, folio,
- folio->index, NODE_TYPE_REGULAR, true);
- f2fs_bug_on(sbi, folio->index != nid_of_node(folio));
- }
+ if (is_node_folio(folio) &&
+ f2fs_sanity_check_node_footer(sbi, folio,
+ folio->index, NODE_TYPE_REGULAR, true))
+ bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
+
if (f2fs_in_warm_node_list(folio))
f2fs_del_fsync_node_entry(sbi, folio);
--
2.43.0
On 5/17/2026 8:52 AM, Deepanshu Kartikey wrote:
> Syzbot reports a recurrence of the kernel BUG in f2fs_write_end_io:
>
> kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/data.c:388!
> Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 15 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 PREEMPT_{RT,(full)}
> RIP: 0010:f2fs_write_end_io+0x16df/0x1740
> Call Trace:
> blk_update_request+0x57e/0xe60
> blk_mq_end_request+0x3e/0x70
> blk_done_softirq+0x10a/0x160
> handle_softirqs+0x1de/0x6d0
> run_ksoftirqd+0x52/0x180
>
> Commit 50ac3ecd8e05 ("f2fs: fix to do sanity check on node footer
> in {read,write}_end_io") added f2fs_sanity_check_node_footer() to
> both end_io paths to catch corrupted node footers reachable from
> fuzzed on-disk images. In f2fs_write_end_io(), however, the
> existing
>
> f2fs_bug_on(sbi, folio->index != nid_of_node(folio));
>
> was left in place immediately after the new helper call. The
> helper detects the mismatch, sets SBI_NEED_FSCK and emits a
> ratelimited warning, but its return value is discarded and the
> following f2fs_bug_on() panics on the exact same condition.
>
> Tracing the reproducer confirms the failure path. A node folio
> with index=11 is looked up via __get_node_folio(), the
> synchronous sanity check at page_hit fails with -EFSCORRUPTED
> and out_err clears uptodate but leaves the dirty bit set from
> the folio's earlier lifecycle. A subsequent read_node_folio()
> fails with the same error (footer_nid=0, ino=0), and
> folio_end_read(folio, false) does not clear dirty either. The
> writeback iterator then finds the still-dirty folio via the
> PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY tag and submits it. f2fs_write_end_io()
> observes folio->index=11 with nid_of_node(folio)=0 and panics
> from softirq context via blk_done_softirq, even though
> f2fs_sanity_check_node_footer() has already correctly identified
> the corruption and would have signalled it via its return value.
>
> A filesystem inconsistency reachable from a mounted image must
> not panic the kernel. Mirror the handling already used in
> f2fs_finish_read_bio(): capture the helper's return value and
> mark the bio with BLK_STS_IOERR on mismatch instead of issuing
> BUG_ON. SBI_NEED_FSCK is set by the helper, so fsck.f2fs will
> repair the inconsistency on the next mount.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+4af46ee83100e99bce09@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4af46ee83100e99bce09
> Fixes: 50ac3ecd8e05 ("f2fs: fix to do sanity check on node footer in {read,write}_end_io")
> Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/data.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 8d4f1e75dee3..c149b0ccf22d 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -382,11 +382,11 @@ static void f2fs_write_end_io(struct bio *bio)
> STOP_CP_REASON_WRITE_FAIL);
> }
>
> - if (is_node_folio(folio)) {
> - f2fs_sanity_check_node_footer(sbi, folio,
> - folio->index, NODE_TYPE_REGULAR, true);
> - f2fs_bug_on(sbi, folio->index != nid_of_node(folio));
Well, I don't think removing the f2fs_bug_on() is the right way to fix this,
because we may lose chance to detect any f2fs bug w/o f2fs_bug_on().
The problem here is why we haven't detected such inconsistent node footer
before writebacking the node folio.
I find a missing case, please take a look:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chao/linux.git/commit/?h=syzbot&id=20e7d40cfa8d2afdc16ed2d3df24ef68ebda71ba
Thanks,
> - }
> + if (is_node_folio(folio) &&
> + f2fs_sanity_check_node_footer(sbi, folio,
> + folio->index, NODE_TYPE_REGULAR, true))
> + bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
> +
> if (f2fs_in_warm_node_list(folio))
> f2fs_del_fsync_node_entry(sbi, folio);
>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.