"Advice" is an uncountable noun, so "these advices" is grammatically
incorrect.

Replace it with "all of this advice" instead, which keeps the sentence
grammatical while also making it clear that it refers to the full set of
recommendations in the paragraph.

Signed-off-by: Chen-Shi-Hong <eric039eric@gmail.com>
---
v4:
- move version changelog below the "---"
- send as a separate thread

v3:
- resend against the original base as requested
- replace "these advices" directly with "all of this advice"

v2:
- use "all of this advice" based on review feedback
 Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst
index 16a66a1f1975..87dd874fffcf 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ After these preparations you'll now enter the main part:
    situations; during the merge window that actually might be even the best
    approach, but in that development phase it can be an even better idea to
    suspend your efforts for a few days anyway. Whatever version you choose,
-   ideally use a 'vanilla' build. Ignoring these advices will dramatically
+   ideally use a 'vanilla' build. Ignoring all of this advice will dramatically
    increase the risk your report will be rejected or ignored.
 
  * Ensure the kernel you just installed does not 'taint' itself when
@@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ Install a fresh kernel for testing
     situations; during the merge window that actually might be even the best
     approach, but in that development phase it can be an even better idea to
     suspend your efforts for a few days anyway. Whatever version you choose,
-    ideally use a 'vanilla' built. Ignoring these advices will dramatically
+    ideally use a 'vanilla' built. Ignoring all of this advice will dramatically
     increase the risk your report will be rejected or ignored.*
 
 As mentioned in the detailed explanation for the first step already: Like most
-- 
2.53.0

Chen-Shi-Hong <eric039eric@gmail.com> writes:

> "Advice" is an uncountable noun, so "these advices" is grammatically
> incorrect.
>
> Replace it with "all of this advice" instead, which keeps the sentence
> grammatical while also making it clear that it refers to the full set of
> recommendations in the paragraph.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Shi-Hong <eric039eric@gmail.com>
> ---
> v4:
> - move version changelog below the "---"
> - send as a separate thread
>
> v3:
> - resend against the original base as requested
> - replace "these advices" directly with "all of this advice"
>
> v2:
> - use "all of this advice" based on review feedback
>  Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks.

jon

Hi Chen-Shi-Hong,

On 2026/5/14 16:27, Chen-Shi-Hong wrote:
> "Advice" is an uncountable noun, so "these advices" is grammatically
> incorrect.
>
> Replace it with "all of this advice" instead, which keeps the sentence
> grammatical while also making it clear that it refers to the full set of
> recommendations in the paragraph.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Shi-Hong <eric039eric@gmail.com>
> ---
> v4:
> - move version changelog below the "---"
> - send as a separate thread
>
> v3:
> - resend against the original base as requested
> - replace "these advices" directly with "all of this advice"
>
> v2:
> - use "all of this advice" based on review feedback
>   Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst
> index 16a66a1f1975..87dd874fffcf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ After these preparations you'll now enter the main part:
>      situations; during the merge window that actually might be even the best
>      approach, but in that development phase it can be an even better idea to
>      suspend your efforts for a few days anyway. Whatever version you choose,
> -   ideally use a 'vanilla' build. Ignoring these advices will dramatically
> +   ideally use a 'vanilla' build. Ignoring all of this advice will dramatically
>      increase the risk your report will be rejected or ignored.
>   
>    * Ensure the kernel you just installed does not 'taint' itself when
> @@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ Install a fresh kernel for testing
>       situations; during the merge window that actually might be even the best
>       approach, but in that development phase it can be an even better idea to
>       suspend your efforts for a few days anyway. Whatever version you choose,
> -    ideally use a 'vanilla' built. Ignoring these advices will dramatically
> +    ideally use a 'vanilla' built. Ignoring all of this advice will dramatically
>       increase the risk your report will be rejected or ignored.*
>   
>   As mentioned in the detailed explanation for the first step already: Like most

Reviewed-by: WangYuli <wangyl5933@chinaunicom.cn>

I searched the kernel tree for the misspelling "advices" (the word
"advice" is uncountable) and found the following occurrences:

"

   >rg-i "advices"

tools/perf/trace/beauty/mmap.c
   68:       static DEFINE_STRARRAY(madvise_advices, "MADV_");
   70:       if (behavior < strarray__madvise_advices.nr_entries && 
strarray__madvise_advices.entries[behavior] != NULL)
   71:               return scnprintf(bf, size, "MADV_%s", 
strarray__madvise_advices.entries[behavior]);

tools/perf/trace/beauty/madvise_behavior.sh
   6:printf "static const char *madvise_advices[] = {\n"

tools/perf/trace/beauty/fadvise.sh
   6:printf "static const char *fadvise_advices[] = {\n"

tools/include/uapi/README
   26:  static const char *fadvise_advices[] = {

tools/testing/selftests/mm/process_madv.c
   125: * on a remote process, other advicesare difficult to verify 
reliably.

tools/testing/selftests/mm/pfnmap.c
   175:int advices[] = {
   187:/* All these advicesmust be rejected. */
   188:for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(advices); i++) {
   189:EXPECT_LT(madvise(self->addr1, self->pagesize, advices[i]), 0);

drivers/ata/pata_sis.c
   13: * Daniela Engert: for initial ATA100 advicesand numerous others.

drivers/md/dm-vdo/message-stats.c
   234:write_u64("dedupeAdviceStale : ", stats->dedupe_advice_stale, ", 
", buf, maxlen);

Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst
   132:   ideally use a 'vanilla' build. Ignoring these adviceswill 
dramatically
   798:    ideally use a 'vanilla' built. Ignoring these adviceswill 
dramatically

Documentation/usb/CREDITS
   118:  evaluation boards, specs and valuable advicesduring

Documentation/scsi/ChangeLog.sym53c8xx
   415:  my questions and for his interesting advicesand comments about
"

If you intend to fix this misspelling, please consider sending a
single patchset that corrects all of these instances across the tree
and adds "advices" to scripts/spelling.txt.

That waycheckpatch.pl <https://checkpatch.pl/> can catch it in the future.

Thanks,

---

WangYuli

WangYuli <wangyuli@aosc.io> writes:

> I searched the kernel tree for the misspelling "advices" (the word
> "advice" is uncountable) and found the following occurrences:
>
> "
>
>    >rg-i "advices"
>
> tools/perf/trace/beauty/mmap.c
>    68:       static DEFINE_STRARRAY(madvise_advices, "MADV_");
>    70:       if (behavior < strarray__madvise_advices.nr_entries && 
> strarray__madvise_advices.entries[behavior] != NULL)
>    71:               return scnprintf(bf, size, "MADV_%s", 
> strarray__madvise_advices.entries[behavior]);

Please, no.  If you start churning the code in that way you will
certainly get pushback.  Typo fixes are a fine way to learn the process,
but I really hope that contributors will move on quickly to more
substantial work.

Thanks,

jon

Hi jon,

On 2026/5/14 20:18, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Please, no.  If you start churning the code in that way you will
> certainly get pushback.  Typo fixes are a fine way to learn the process,
> but I really hope that contributors will move on quickly to more
> substantial work.

You're right. I take back my suggestion.

Thanks,

---

WangYuli