[PATCH] ASoC: sigmadsp: Use flexible array for control cache

Rosen Penev posted 1 patch 1 month ago
sound/soc/codecs/sigmadsp.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[PATCH] ASoC: sigmadsp: Use flexible array for control cache
Posted by Rosen Penev 1 month ago
Allocate SigmaDSP controls with kzalloc_flex() for the trailing
cache data instead of open-coding the size calculation.

Annotate the cache array with its existing byte count so the allocation
helper can initialize the counter.

Assisted-by: Codex:GPT-5.5
Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
---
 sound/soc/codecs/sigmadsp.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/sigmadsp.c b/sound/soc/codecs/sigmadsp.c
index 3343dbb63d2b..2e08fde3989c 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/sigmadsp.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/sigmadsp.c
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ struct sigmadsp_control {
 	struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol;
 	bool is_readback;
 	bool cached;
-	uint8_t cache[];
+	u8 cache[] __counted_by(num_bytes);
 };
 
 struct sigmadsp_data {
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static int sigma_fw_load_control(struct sigmadsp *sigmadsp,
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	num_bytes = le16_to_cpu(ctrl_chunk->num_bytes);
-	ctrl = kzalloc(sizeof(*ctrl) + num_bytes, GFP_KERNEL);
+	ctrl = kzalloc_flex(*ctrl, cache, num_bytes);
 	if (!ctrl)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-- 
2.54.0
Re: [PATCH] ASoC: sigmadsp: Use flexible array for control cache
Posted by Mark Brown 3 weeks, 6 days ago
On Mon, 11 May 2026 16:03:51 -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> ASoC: sigmadsp: Use flexible array for control cache

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-7.2

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: sigmadsp: Use flexible array for control cache
      https://git.kernel.org/broonie/sound/c/e0014849e9af

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark