Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,tcsr.yaml | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Document the TCSR block found on the Qualcomm's IPQ9650 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <kathiravan.thirumoorthy@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,tcsr.yaml | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,tcsr.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,tcsr.yaml
index 14ae3f00ef7e..8914c882fc35 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,tcsr.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,tcsr.yaml
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ properties:
- qcom,tcsr-ipq8064
- qcom,tcsr-ipq8074
- qcom,tcsr-ipq9574
+ - qcom,tcsr-ipq9650
- qcom,tcsr-mdm9615
- qcom,tcsr-msm8226
- qcom,tcsr-msm8660
---
base-commit: e98d21c170b01ddef366f023bbfcf6b31509fa83
change-id: 20260511-ipq9650_tcsr_binding-70d665950fdf
Best regards,
--
Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <kathiravan.thirumoorthy@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 10:28:04PM +0530, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote: > Document the TCSR block found on the Qualcomm's IPQ9650 SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <kathiravan.thirumoorthy@oss.qualcomm.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,tcsr.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > NAK, I said it way too many times. You just sent COMPLETELY separately IPQ5210 and on the same day, completely separately this patch. I gave this feedback publicly and internally to Qualcomm already multiple times. NAK Best regards, Krzysztof
On 5/15/2026 1:52 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 10:28:04PM +0530, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote: >> Document the TCSR block found on the Qualcomm's IPQ9650 SoC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <kathiravan.thirumoorthy@oss.qualcomm.com> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,tcsr.yaml | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> > NAK, I said it way too many times. You just sent COMPLETELY separately > IPQ5210 and on the same day, completely separately this patch. > > I gave this feedback publicly and internally to Qualcomm already > multiple times. > > NAK Apologies. I should have sent both IPQ9650 and IPQ5210 bindings together. Will take care of this. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.