[PATCH] power: supply: cros_charge-control: Move MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE next to the table itself

Krzysztof Kozlowski posted 1 patch 1 month, 1 week ago
drivers/power/supply/cros_charge-control.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH] power: supply: cros_charge-control: Move MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE next to the table itself
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 1 month, 1 week ago
By convention MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() immediately follows the ID table it
exports, because this is easier to read and verify.  It also makes more
sense since #ifdef for ACPI or OF could hide both of them.

Most of the privers already have this correctly placed, so adjust
the missing ones.  No functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
 drivers/power/supply/cros_charge-control.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/cros_charge-control.c b/drivers/power/supply/cros_charge-control.c
index 53e6a77e03fc..6a5e54218178 100644
--- a/drivers/power/supply/cros_charge-control.c
+++ b/drivers/power/supply/cros_charge-control.c
@@ -323,6 +323,7 @@ static const struct platform_device_id cros_chctl_id[] = {
 	{ "cros-charge-control", 0 },
 	{}
 };
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, cros_chctl_id);
 
 static struct platform_driver cros_chctl_driver = {
 	.driver.name	= "cros-charge-control",
@@ -331,7 +332,6 @@ static struct platform_driver cros_chctl_driver = {
 };
 module_platform_driver(cros_chctl_driver);
 
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, cros_chctl_id);
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ChromeOS EC charge control");
 MODULE_AUTHOR("Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>");
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-- 
2.51.0

Re: [PATCH] power: supply: cros_charge-control: Move MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE next to the table itself
Posted by Thomas Weißschuh 1 month, 1 week ago
On 2026-05-05 12:27:52+0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> By convention MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() immediately follows the ID table it
> exports, because this is easier to read and verify.  It also makes more
> sense since #ifdef for ACPI or OF could hide both of them.
> 
> Most of the privers already have this correctly placed, so adjust
> the missing ones.  No functional impact.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>

Acked-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>

(...)
Re: [PATCH] power: supply: cros_charge-control: Move MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE next to the table itself
Posted by Tzung-Bi Shih 1 month, 1 week ago
On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 12:27:52PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> By convention MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() immediately follows the ID table it
> exports, because this is easier to read and verify.  It also makes more
> sense since #ifdef for ACPI or OF could hide both of them.
> 
> Most of the privers already have this correctly placed, so adjust
              ^ d

> the missing ones.  No functional impact.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>

Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>