drivers/staging/gpib/gpio/gpib_bitbang.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Replace sizeof(struct bb_priv) with sizeof(*board->private_data)
to follow kernel coding style and improve maintainability.
checkpatch.pl also reports that LINVAL macro should be enclosed
in parentheses. However, LINVAL intentionally expands to a
comma-separated list of arguments matching the LINFMT format
string used in dbg_printk() calls.
Wrapping it in parentheses would change semantics due to the
comma operator, causing only the last expression to be passed.
Therefore, no change is made to LINVAL.
Signed-off-by: Ajanth Badiger <badigerajanth1301@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/gpib/gpio/gpib_bitbang.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/gpib/gpio/gpib_bitbang.c b/drivers/staging/gpib/gpio/gpib_bitbang.c
index 374cd61355e9..2fff9ec9a01c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/gpib/gpio/gpib_bitbang.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/gpib/gpio/gpib_bitbang.c
@@ -1066,7 +1066,7 @@ static int bb_line_status(const struct gpib_board *board)
static int allocate_private(struct gpib_board *board)
{
- board->private_data = kzalloc(sizeof(struct bb_priv), GFP_KERNEL);
+ board->private_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*board->private_data), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!board->private_data)
return -1;
return 0;
--
2.43.0
On Sun, May 03, 2026 at 03:05:58PM +0530, Ajanth Badiger wrote: > Replace sizeof(struct bb_priv) with sizeof(*board->private_data) > to follow kernel coding style and improve maintainability. > > checkpatch.pl also reports that LINVAL macro should be enclosed > in parentheses. However, LINVAL intentionally expands to a > comma-separated list of arguments matching the LINFMT format > string used in dbg_printk() calls. > > Wrapping it in parentheses would change semantics due to the > comma operator, causing only the last expression to be passed. > > Therefore, no change is made to LINVAL. > > Signed-off-by: Ajanth Badiger <badigerajanth1301@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/staging/gpib/gpio/gpib_bitbang.c | 2 +- This file is not in the tree, what version did you make this against? Please always use linux-next for development work. thanks, greg k-h
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.