Document QMP UFS PHY on Qualcomm Nord SoC which is compatible with
'qcom,sm8650-qmp-ufs-phy'.

Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shengchao.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
Changes in v2:
 - Add Nord compatible to existing qcom,sm8650-qmp-ufs-phy item instead
   of duplicating (Thanks Krzysztof!)
 - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260420074942.1250414-1-shengchao.guo@oss.qualcomm.com/

 .../devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml       | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml
index 9616c736b6d4..b2c5c9a375a3 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-ufs-phy.yaml
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ properties:
       - items:
           - enum:
               - qcom,eliza-qmp-ufs-phy
+              - qcom,nord-qmp-ufs-phy
           - const: qcom,sm8650-qmp-ufs-phy
       - items:
           - enum:
-- 
2.43.0

On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 09:27:32AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Document QMP UFS PHY on Qualcomm Nord SoC which is compatible with
> 'qcom,sm8650-qmp-ufs-phy'.

Why are you naming compatibles not devices in the commit msgs? We never
used, never asked for it, there are basically no such commits. git log
can help here, for example  last commit from Abel looks reasonable
(although repeating "so use fallback" is redundant - it's obvious).

Best regards,
Krzysztof