Fix coccicheck warning
./namei.c:150:25-32: WARNING: Consider using %pe to print PTR_ERR()

Replace %ld with %pe and PTR_ERR(bh) with bh pointer.
The %pe specifier automatically converts error pointers to
human-readable error names instead of raw error codes.

Signed-off-by: Abdellah Ouhbi <abdououhbi1@gmail.com>
---
 fs/ext4/namei.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c
index 4a47fbd8dd30..c0cabf172020 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
@@ -145,9 +145,9 @@ static struct buffer_head *__ext4_read_dirblock(struct inode *inode,
 	if (IS_ERR(bh)) {
 		__ext4_warning(inode->i_sb, func, line,
 			       "inode #%llu: lblock %lu: comm %s: "
-			       "error %ld reading directory block",
+			       "error %pe reading directory block",
 			       inode->i_ino, (unsigned long)block,
-			       current->comm, PTR_ERR(bh));
+			       current->comm, bh);
 
 		return bh;
 	}
-- 
2.51.0

On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 04:22:45PM +0100, Abdellah Ouhbi wrote:
> Fix coccicheck warning
> ./namei.c:150:25-32: WARNING: Consider using %pe to print PTR_ERR()
> 
> Replace %ld with %pe and PTR_ERR(bh) with bh pointer.
> The %pe specifier automatically converts error pointers to
> human-readable error names instead of raw error codes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abdellah Ouhbi <abdououhbi1@gmail.com>

I've folded the three patches you had sent into a single commit.  For
this kind of cleanup, there's no reason to have separate patches for
each file.

Thanks,

						- Ted

On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 04:22:45PM +0100, Abdellah Ouhbi wrote:
> Fix coccicheck warning
> ./namei.c:150:25-32: WARNING: Consider using %pe to print PTR_ERR()
> 
> Replace %ld with %pe and PTR_ERR(bh) with bh pointer.
> The %pe specifier automatically converts error pointers to
> human-readable error names instead of raw error codes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abdellah Ouhbi <abdououhbi1@gmail.com>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/namei.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c
> index 4a47fbd8dd30..c0cabf172020 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
> @@ -145,9 +145,9 @@ static struct buffer_head *__ext4_read_dirblock(struct inode *inode,
>  	if (IS_ERR(bh)) {
>  		__ext4_warning(inode->i_sb, func, line,
>  			       "inode #%llu: lblock %lu: comm %s: "
> -			       "error %ld reading directory block",
> +			       "error %pe reading directory block",
>  			       inode->i_ino, (unsigned long)block,
> -			       current->comm, PTR_ERR(bh));
> +			       current->comm, bh);
>  
>  		return bh;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.51.0
> 

OK, this looks fine. I do wonder if using %pe really makes sense here
since this thing never gets to be a pointer, so if I read this and don't
notice the IS_ERR(bh) I might think that bh could be a pointer there if
I'm reading quickly.

Thanks,
Jori.