Hi Bjorn,
On 4/24/26 11:07, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Recently, on Eliza & Milos, the CX has been tied up to the GCC,
> but this is valid for most platforms including sm8[456]50.
> So tie the CX power domain to the GCC as well, for the
> same exact reasons as on Eliza & Milos.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
> ---
> Neil Armstrong (6):
> dt-bindings: clock: qcom: gcc-sm8450: Add missing power-domains property
> dt-bindings: clock: qcom: sm8550-gcc: Add missing power-domains property
> dt-bindings: clock: qcom: sm8650-gcc: Add missing power-domains property
> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add missing CX power domain to GCC
> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Add missing CX power domain to GCC
> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650: Add missing CX power domain to GCC
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sm8450.yaml | 5 +++++
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8550-gcc.yaml | 5 +++++
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8650-gcc.yaml | 5 +++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 1 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi | 1 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi | 2 ++
> 6 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
> ---
> base-commit: 4c406406070d57dbefeaad149181785330c23f92
> change-id: 20260424-topic-sm8x50-tie-gcc-to-cx-e756afa72bb8
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
>
Why didn't you pick up up those changes ?
Thanks,
Neil