Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
qcom,hawi-smmu-500 was placed in the wrong enum block of GPU. Move it to
the correct location alongside other Qualcomm SMMU-500 compatibles for
CPU.
Fixes: 5e8323c3d528 ("dt-bindings: arm-smmu: qcom: Add compatible for Hawi SoC")
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
index 06fb5c8e7547..ba9ad1f5a8ff 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ properties:
- enum:
- qcom,eliza-smmu-500
- qcom,glymur-smmu-500
+ - qcom,hawi-smmu-500
- qcom,kaanapali-smmu-500
- qcom,milos-smmu-500
- qcom,qcm2290-smmu-500
@@ -93,7 +94,6 @@ properties:
items:
- enum:
- qcom,glymur-smmu-500
- - qcom,hawi-smmu-500
- qcom,kaanapali-smmu-500
- qcom,milos-smmu-500
- qcom,qcm2290-smmu-500
--
2.53.0
On 22/04/2026 10:33, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> qcom,hawi-smmu-500 was placed in the wrong enum block of GPU. Move it to
> the correct location alongside other Qualcomm SMMU-500 compatibles for
> CPU.
How could it pass dtbs_check?
>
> Fixes: 5e8323c3d528 ("dt-bindings: arm-smmu: qcom: Add compatible for Hawi SoC")
> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> index 06fb5c8e7547..ba9ad1f5a8ff 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ properties:
> - enum:
> - qcom,eliza-smmu-500
> - qcom,glymur-smmu-500
> + - qcom,hawi-smmu-500
> - qcom,kaanapali-smmu-500
> - qcom,milos-smmu-500
> - qcom,qcm2290-smmu-500
> @@ -93,7 +94,6 @@ properties:
> items:
> - enum:
> - qcom,glymur-smmu-500
> - - qcom,hawi-smmu-500
No, why? That's for GPU. Why are you moving GPU compatible to non-GPU place?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 11:04:09AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/04/2026 10:33, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> > qcom,hawi-smmu-500 was placed in the wrong enum block of GPU. Move it to
> > the correct location alongside other Qualcomm SMMU-500 compatibles for
> > CPU.
>
> How could it pass dtbs_check?
It was bad on my part.
> >
> > Fixes: 5e8323c3d528 ("dt-bindings: arm-smmu: qcom: Add compatible for Hawi SoC")
> > Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> > index 06fb5c8e7547..ba9ad1f5a8ff 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ properties:
> > - enum:
> > - qcom,eliza-smmu-500
> > - qcom,glymur-smmu-500
> > + - qcom,hawi-smmu-500
> > - qcom,kaanapali-smmu-500
> > - qcom,milos-smmu-500
> > - qcom,qcm2290-smmu-500
> > @@ -93,7 +94,6 @@ properties:
> > items:
> > - enum:
> > - qcom,glymur-smmu-500
> > - - qcom,hawi-smmu-500
>
> No, why? That's for GPU. Why are you moving GPU compatible to non-GPU place?
Earlier commit was meant for CPUs and not for GPUs, hence moving it Or,
Are you saying do not do the movement and add one for CPUs ?
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
--
-Mukesh Ojha
On 22/04/2026 16:27, Mukesh Ojha wrote: >>> - enum: >>> - qcom,eliza-smmu-500 >>> - qcom,glymur-smmu-500 >>> + - qcom,hawi-smmu-500 >>> - qcom,kaanapali-smmu-500 >>> - qcom,milos-smmu-500 >>> - qcom,qcm2290-smmu-500 >>> @@ -93,7 +94,6 @@ properties: >>> items: >>> - enum: >>> - qcom,glymur-smmu-500 >>> - - qcom,hawi-smmu-500 >> >> No, why? That's for GPU. Why are you moving GPU compatible to non-GPU place? > > Earlier commit was meant for CPUs and not for GPUs, hence moving it Or, OK, but: > Are you saying do not do the movement and add one for CPUs ? yeah, because you might need it in this place for the GPU. Therefore I would propose to check what compatible you expect for the GPU part and just add it. Best regards, Krzysztof
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.