Improve wording of a TODO comment to better describe the
intended optimization. The comment now clearly states that
only the changed display area should be updated instead of
refreshing the entire screen.

Signed-off-by: Sachin Kumar <sachinkumar905846@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
index f427c0914..4984aad9c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
@@ -414,7 +414,9 @@ static void fbtft_ops_damage_range(struct fb_info *info, off_t off, size_t len)
 {
 	struct fbtft_par *par = info->par;
 
-	/* TODO: only mark changed area update all for now */
+	/* TODO: Optimize to update only the changed area instead of
+	 * refreshing the entire display
+	 */
 	par->fbtftops.mkdirty(info, -1, 0);
 }
 
-- 
2.43.0

On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 7:47 PM Sachin Kumar
<sachinkumar905846@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Improve wording of a TODO comment to better describe the
> intended optimization. The comment now clearly states that
> only the changed display area should be updated instead of
> refreshing the entire screen.

...

> -       /* TODO: only mark changed area update all for now */
> +       /* TODO: Optimize to update only the changed area instead of
> +        * refreshing the entire display
> +        */

Wrong style.


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Improve wording of a TODO comment to better describe the
intended optimization. The comment now clearly states that
only the changed display area should be updated instead of
refreshing the entire screen.

Signed-off-by: Sachin Kumar <sachinkumar905846@gmail.com>
---
v3:
- add missing changelog for previous version
- simplify TODO comment to match kernel style

 drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
index f427c0914..cff838955 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static void fbtft_ops_damage_range(struct fb_info *info, off_t off, size_t len)
 {
 	struct fbtft_par *par = info->par;
 
-	/* TODO: only mark changed area update all for now */
+	/* TODO: update only changed area, not entire display */
 	par->fbtftops.mkdirty(info, -1, 0);
 }
 
-- 
2.43.0

On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 03:03:03PM +0530, Sachin Kumar wrote:
> Improve wording of a TODO comment to better describe the
> intended optimization. The comment now clearly states that
> only the changed display area should be updated instead of
> refreshing the entire screen.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kumar <sachinkumar905846@gmail.com>
> ---
> v3:
> - add missing changelog for previous version
> - simplify TODO comment to match kernel style
> 
>  drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
> index f427c0914..cff838955 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
> @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static void fbtft_ops_damage_range(struct fb_info *info, off_t off, size_t len)
>  {
>  	struct fbtft_par *par = info->par;
>  
> -	/* TODO: only mark changed area update all for now */
> +	/* TODO: update only changed area, not entire display */
>  	par->fbtftops.mkdirty(info, -1, 0);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

Does not apply to the tree anymore :(

Improve wording of a TODO comment to better describe the
intended optimization. The comment now clearly states that
only the changed display area should be updated instead of
refreshing the entire screen.

Signed-off-by: Sachin Kumar <sachinkumar905846@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
index f427c0914..cff838955 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static void fbtft_ops_damage_range(struct fb_info *info, off_t off, size_t len)
 {
 	struct fbtft_par *par = info->par;
 
-	/* TODO: only mark changed area update all for now */
+	/* TODO: update only changed area, not entire display */
 	par->fbtftops.mkdirty(info, -1, 0);
 }
 
-- 
2.43.0

On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 12:24:38AM +0530, Sachin Kumar wrote:
> Improve wording of a TODO comment to better describe the
> intended optimization. The comment now clearly states that
> only the changed display area should be updated instead of
> refreshing the entire screen.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kumar <sachinkumar905846@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
> index f427c0914..cff838955 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
> @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static void fbtft_ops_damage_range(struct fb_info *info, off_t off, size_t len)
>  {
>  	struct fbtft_par *par = info->par;
>  
> -	/* TODO: only mark changed area update all for now */
> +	/* TODO: update only changed area, not entire display */
>  	par->fbtftops.mkdirty(info, -1, 0);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
  did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
  Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
  kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
  needs to be done here to properly describe this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot

Improve wording of a TODO comment to better describe the
intended optimization. The comment now clearly states that
only the changed display area should be updated instead of
refreshing the entire screen.

Signed-off-by: Sachin Kumar <sachinkumar905846@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
index f427c0914..cff838955 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static void fbtft_ops_damage_range(struct fb_info *info, off_t off, size_t len)
 {
 	struct fbtft_par *par = info->par;
 
-	/* TODO: only mark changed area update all for now */
+	/* TODO: update only changed area, not entire display */
 	par->fbtftops.mkdirty(info, -1, 0);
 }
 
-- 
2.43.0