drivers/staging/iio/frequency/ad9834.c | 21 ++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Cleanup include headers by removing proxy kernel.h header and
unnecessary list.h, interrupt.h, workqueue.h and slab.h headers. Added
additional headers that were previously included from kernel.h.
Verified using the include-what-you-use tool.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Crofts <joshua.crofts1@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/iio/frequency/ad9834.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/frequency/ad9834.c b/drivers/staging/iio/frequency/ad9834.c
index d339d5e8e0..9b65fbe1c7 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/iio/frequency/ad9834.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/iio/frequency/ad9834.c
@@ -5,18 +5,21 @@
* Copyright 2010-2011 Analog Devices Inc.
*/
+#include <linux/bits.h>
#include <linux/clk.h>
-#include <linux/interrupt.h>
-#include <linux/workqueue.h>
-#include <linux/device.h>
-#include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/slab.h>
-#include <linux/sysfs.h>
-#include <linux/list.h>
-#include <linux/spi/spi.h>
-#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
+#include <linux/dev_printk.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/kstrtox.h>
+#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
+#include <linux/spi/spi.h>
+#include <linux/string.h>
+#include <linux/sysfs.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+#include <asm/byteorder.h>
#include <asm/div64.h>
#include <linux/iio/iio.h>
--
2.47.3
On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 09:32:40AM +0000, Joshua Crofts wrote: > Cleanup include headers by removing proxy kernel.h header and > unnecessary list.h, interrupt.h, workqueue.h and slab.h headers. Added > additional headers that were previously included from kernel.h. > > Verified using the include-what-you-use tool. I'm wondering why in previous round the tool haven't noticed what I did... ... > +#include <linux/bits.h> > #include <linux/clk.h> > -#include <linux/interrupt.h> > -#include <linux/workqueue.h> > -#include <linux/device.h> > -#include <linux/kernel.h> > -#include <linux/slab.h> > -#include <linux/sysfs.h> > -#include <linux/list.h> > -#include <linux/spi/spi.h> > -#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h> > +#include <linux/dev_printk.h> > #include <linux/err.h> > +#include <linux/kstrtox.h> > +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h> > #include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/mutex.h> > +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h> > +#include <linux/spi/spi.h> > +#include <linux/string.h> Hmm... What's used for here? > +#include <linux/sysfs.h> > +#include <linux/types.h> > + > +#include <asm/byteorder.h> > #include <asm/div64.h> -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, 17 Apr 2026 at 08:47, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote: > I'm wondering why in previous round the tool haven't noticed what I did... Yeah, the tool is pretty noisy unfortunately, even with tweaking it's not exactly 100%. > > +#include <linux/string.h> > > Hmm... What's used for here? sysfs_streq() is defined in linux/string.h. -- Kind regards CJD
On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 09:13:27AM +0200, Joshua Crofts wrote: > On Fri, 17 Apr 2026 at 08:47, Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote: > > I'm wondering why in previous round the tool haven't noticed what I did... > > Yeah, the tool is pretty noisy unfortunately, even with tweaking it's > not exactly 100%. Yes, that's why one still needs to understand more about headers in the Linux kernel to do such a "simple" change. > > > +#include <linux/string.h> > > > > Hmm... What's used for here? > > sysfs_streq() is defined in linux/string.h. Oh, surprise surprise :-), thanks for pointing this out! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, 17 Apr 2026 at 09:26, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote: > Yes, that's why one still needs to understand more about headers in the Linux > kernel to do such a "simple" change. Yup, it's definitely a task that seems easy on the surface level (but isn't). Also the concept of kernel.h is truly a fun one. > Oh, surprise surprise :-), thanks for pointing this out! No problem, surprisingly one of the things that IWYU got right. -- Kind regards CJD
On Fri, 17 Apr 2026 09:34:38 +0200 Joshua Crofts <joshua.crofts1@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 17 Apr 2026 at 09:26, Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote: > > Yes, that's why one still needs to understand more about headers in the Linux > > kernel to do such a "simple" change. > > Yup, it's definitely a task that seems easy on the surface level (but > isn't). Also the concept of > kernel.h is truly a fun one. > > > Oh, surprise surprise :-), thanks for pointing this out! > > No problem, surprisingly one of the things that IWYU got right. > Looks fine to me. Applied to the testing branch of iio.git Thanks, Jonathan
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.