The driver for the Technologic Systems (EmbeddedTS) TS-7300 board's
onboard FPGA didn't have an OF match table. This prevented it from being
instantiated from a device tree. This is undesirable given EP93xx is
moving to device tree, and effectively prevents it from being used.
This patch series adds the OF match table and a device tree binding.

Changes since v1:
  - Use specific compatible "technologic,ts7300-fpga" instead of
    wildcard "technologic,ts73xx-fpga" (Krzysztof)
  - Fix subject line for dt-bindings patch (Krzysztof)
  - Simplify example in binding doc (Krzysztof)

Phil Pemberton (2):
  dt-bindings: fpga: Technologic Systems TS-7300 FPGA Manager
  fpga: ts73xx-fpga: add OF match table for device tree probing

 .../fpga/technologic,ts7300-fpga.yaml         | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/fpga/ts73xx-fpga.c                    |  9 +++++
 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/technologic,ts7300-fpga.yaml

-- 
2.43.0

On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 05:52:21PM +0100, Phil Pemberton wrote:
> The driver for the Technologic Systems (EmbeddedTS) TS-7300 board's
> onboard FPGA didn't have an OF match table. This prevented it from being
> instantiated from a device tree. This is undesirable given EP93xx is
> moving to device tree, and effectively prevents it from being used.
> This patch series adds the OF match table and a device tree binding.
> 
> Changes since v1:
>   - Use specific compatible "technologic,ts7300-fpga" instead of
>     wildcard "technologic,ts73xx-fpga" (Krzysztof)
>   - Fix subject line for dt-bindings patch (Krzysztof)
>   - Simplify example in binding doc (Krzysztof)

Missing explanation of dropping tags.

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer
will do that for tags received on the version they apply.

Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state in the patch changelog
or cover letter why and what changed.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof