[PATCH 0/2] regulator: even more OF node imbalance fixes

Johan Hovold posted 2 patches 2 months, 2 weeks ago
drivers/regulator/act8945a-regulator.c  | 3 ++-
drivers/regulator/bd9571mwv-regulator.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[PATCH 0/2] regulator: even more OF node imbalance fixes
Posted by Johan Hovold 2 months, 2 weeks ago
I missed these drivers which probably meant to set config->of_node in my
previous rounds.

Johan


Johan Hovold (2):
  regulator: act8945a: fix OF node reference imbalance
  regulator: bd9571mwv: fix OF node reference imbalance

 drivers/regulator/act8945a-regulator.c  | 3 ++-
 drivers/regulator/bd9571mwv-regulator.c | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
2.52.0
Re: [PATCH 0/2] regulator: even more OF node imbalance fixes
Posted by Mark Brown 2 months, 2 weeks ago
On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 02:48:34PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:

> I missed these drivers which probably meant to set config->of_node in my
> previous rounds.

It would be somewhat easier to just send individual patches for all
these things, there's no real interrelationship between the patches
other than the similarity of the issus.
Re: [PATCH 0/2] regulator: even more OF node imbalance fixes
Posted by Johan Hovold 2 months, 2 weeks ago
On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 02:07:17PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 02:48:34PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> 
> > I missed these drivers which probably meant to set config->of_node in my
> > previous rounds.
> 
> It would be somewhat easier to just send individual patches for all
> these things, there's no real interrelationship between the patches
> other than the similarity of the issus.

Possibly in this case, but not if there is any feedback that applies to
all patches in the series. 

I assume you don't want me to resend these now, though?

Johan
Re: [PATCH 0/2] regulator: even more OF node imbalance fixes
Posted by Mark Brown 2 months, 2 weeks ago
On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 04:52:08PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 02:07:17PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > It would be somewhat easier to just send individual patches for all
> > these things, there's no real interrelationship between the patches
> > other than the similarity of the issus.

> Possibly in this case, but not if there is any feedback that applies to
> all patches in the series. 

Once you're sending multiple similiar followup serieses that

> I assume you don't want me to resend these now, though?

Right, please don't.