net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
`virtio_transport_send_pkt_info` gets all the transport information
from the parameter `t_ops`. There is no need to call
`virtio_transport_get_ops()`.
Remove it.
Fixes: 581512a6dc93 ("vsock/virtio: MSG_ZEROCOPY flag support")
Signed-off-by: Luigi Leonardi <leonardi@redhat.com>
---
I marked this as net-next material, but honsetly I'm not sure if I
should have targeted net. It's not a bug after all, it's just a cleanup.
---
net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
index 8a9fb23c6e85..a152a9e208d0 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
@@ -60,8 +60,6 @@ static bool virtio_transport_can_zcopy(const struct virtio_transport *t_ops,
return false;
/* Check that transport can send data in zerocopy mode. */
- t_ops = virtio_transport_get_ops(info->vsk);
-
if (t_ops->can_msgzerocopy) {
int pages_to_send = iov_iter_npages(iov_iter, MAX_SKB_FRAGS);
---
base-commit: bfe62a454542cfad3379f6ef5680b125f41e20f4
change-id: 20260407-remove_parameter-f61a3e40cf90
Best regards,
--
Luigi Leonardi <leonardi@redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 04:31:56PM +0200, Luigi Leonardi wrote:
>`virtio_transport_send_pkt_info` gets all the transport information
>from the parameter `t_ops`. There is no need to call
>`virtio_transport_get_ops()`.
>
>Remove it.
>
>Fixes: 581512a6dc93 ("vsock/virtio: MSG_ZEROCOPY flag support")
>Signed-off-by: Luigi Leonardi <leonardi@redhat.com>
>---
>I marked this as net-next material, but honsetly I'm not sure if I
>should have targeted net. It's not a bug after all, it's just a cleanup.
The patch LGTM, but as Michael and Jakub pointed out, better to remove
Fixes tag if this is not a bug fix.
Thanks,
Stefano
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>index 8a9fb23c6e85..a152a9e208d0 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>@@ -60,8 +60,6 @@ static bool virtio_transport_can_zcopy(const struct virtio_transport *t_ops,
> return false;
>
> /* Check that transport can send data in zerocopy mode. */
>- t_ops = virtio_transport_get_ops(info->vsk);
>-
> if (t_ops->can_msgzerocopy) {
> int pages_to_send = iov_iter_npages(iov_iter, MAX_SKB_FRAGS);
>
>
>---
>base-commit: bfe62a454542cfad3379f6ef5680b125f41e20f4
>change-id: 20260407-remove_parameter-f61a3e40cf90
>
>Best regards,
>--
>Luigi Leonardi <leonardi@redhat.com>
>
On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 04:31:56PM +0200, Luigi Leonardi wrote:
> `virtio_transport_send_pkt_info` gets all the transport information
> from the parameter `t_ops`. There is no need to call
> `virtio_transport_get_ops()`.
>
> Remove it.
>
> Fixes: 581512a6dc93 ("vsock/virtio: MSG_ZEROCOPY flag support")
> Signed-off-by: Luigi Leonardi <leonardi@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
but I think we should drop the Fixes tag.
> ---
> I marked this as net-next material, but honsetly I'm not sure if I
> should have targeted net. It's not a bug after all, it's just a cleanup.
> ---
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> index 8a9fb23c6e85..a152a9e208d0 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> @@ -60,8 +60,6 @@ static bool virtio_transport_can_zcopy(const struct virtio_transport *t_ops,
> return false;
>
> /* Check that transport can send data in zerocopy mode. */
> - t_ops = virtio_transport_get_ops(info->vsk);
> -
> if (t_ops->can_msgzerocopy) {
> int pages_to_send = iov_iter_npages(iov_iter, MAX_SKB_FRAGS);
>
>
> ---
> base-commit: bfe62a454542cfad3379f6ef5680b125f41e20f4
> change-id: 20260407-remove_parameter-f61a3e40cf90
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Luigi Leonardi <leonardi@redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 12:16:27PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 04:31:56PM +0200, Luigi Leonardi wrote:
>> `virtio_transport_send_pkt_info` gets all the transport information
>> from the parameter `t_ops`. There is no need to call
>> `virtio_transport_get_ops()`.
>>
>> Remove it.
>>
>> Fixes: 581512a6dc93 ("vsock/virtio: MSG_ZEROCOPY flag support")
>> Signed-off-by: Luigi Leonardi <leonardi@redhat.com>
>
>Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>
>but I think we should drop the Fixes tag.
ok, should I send a v2 without the tag?
Thanks,
Luigi
On Tue, 7 Apr 2026 18:22:57 +0200 Luigi Leonardi wrote:
> >> Fixes: 581512a6dc93 ("vsock/virtio: MSG_ZEROCOPY flag support")
> >> Signed-off-by: Luigi Leonardi <leonardi@redhat.com>
> >
> >Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> >
> >but I think we should drop the Fixes tag.
>
> ok, should I send a v2 without the tag?
Yes please
--
pw-bot: cr
07.04.2026 17:31, Luigi Leonardi wrote:
> `virtio_transport_send_pkt_info` gets all the transport information
> from the parameter `t_ops`. There is no need to call
> `virtio_transport_get_ops()`.
Hm, one more suggestion, but not in this patch: may be we can also remove 'struct vsock_sock *vsk' argument
from 'virtio_transport_send_pkt_info()', because it is also included in 'virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info' ?
Thanks
>
> Remove it.
>
> Fixes: 581512a6dc93 ("vsock/virtio: MSG_ZEROCOPY flag support")
> Signed-off-by: Luigi Leonardi <leonardi@redhat.com>
> ---
> I marked this as net-next material, but honsetly I'm not sure if I
> should have targeted net. It's not a bug after all, it's just a cleanup.
> ---
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> index 8a9fb23c6e85..a152a9e208d0 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> @@ -60,8 +60,6 @@ static bool virtio_transport_can_zcopy(const struct virtio_transport *t_ops,
> return false;
>
> /* Check that transport can send data in zerocopy mode. */
> - t_ops = virtio_transport_get_ops(info->vsk);
> -
> if (t_ops->can_msgzerocopy) {
> int pages_to_send = iov_iter_npages(iov_iter, MAX_SKB_FRAGS);
>
>
> ---
> base-commit: bfe62a454542cfad3379f6ef5680b125f41e20f4
> change-id: 20260407-remove_parameter-f61a3e40cf90
>
> Best regards,
Acked-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 07:16:24PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: > > >07.04.2026 17:31, Luigi Leonardi wrote: > >> `virtio_transport_send_pkt_info` gets all the transport information >> from the parameter `t_ops`. There is no need to call >> `virtio_transport_get_ops()`. > >Hm, one more suggestion, but not in this patch: may be we can also remove 'struct vsock_sock *vsk' argument >from 'virtio_transport_send_pkt_info()', because it is also included in 'virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info' ? > Yep, good catch! Thanks, Luigi
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.