Introduce EcoNet EN7528 SoC compatible in MediaTek PCIe controller
binding.

EcoNet PCIe controller has the same configuration model as
Mediatek v2 but is initialized more similarly to an MT7621
PCIe.

Signed-off-by: Caleb James DeLisle <cjd@cjdns.fr>
---
 .../bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie.yaml           | 26 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie.yaml
index 0b8c78ec4f91..7e1b0876c291 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie.yaml
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ properties:
     oneOf:
       - enum:
           - airoha,an7583-pcie
+          - econet,en7528-pcie
           - mediatek,mt2712-pcie
           - mediatek,mt7622-pcie
           - mediatek,mt7629-pcie
@@ -226,6 +227,31 @@ allOf:
 
         mediatek,pbus-csr: false
 
+  - if:
+      properties:
+        compatible:
+          contains:
+            const: econet,en7528-pcie
+    then:
+      properties:
+        clocks:
+          maxItems: 1
+
+        clock-names:
+          maxItems: 1
+
+        reset: false
+
+        reset-names: false
+
+        power-domains: false
+
+        mediatek,pbus-csr: false
+
+      required:
+        - phys
+        - phy-names
+
 unevaluatedProperties: false
 
 examples:
-- 
2.39.5

On Sat, Apr 04, 2026 at 06:28:53PM +0000, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
> Introduce EcoNet EN7528 SoC compatible in MediaTek PCIe controller
> binding.
> 
> EcoNet PCIe controller has the same configuration model as
> Mediatek v2 but is initialized more similarly to an MT7621
> PCIe.
> 

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer
will do that for tags received on the version they apply.

Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state in the patch changelog
or cover letter why and what changed.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof