Fix alignment checks in function signatures

Signed-off-by: Joshua Crofts <joshua.crofts1@gmail.com>
---
v2:
- Rebased patch onto the staging-next branch to resolve CI merge conflict.
- No functional changes to the code.

 drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_fops.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_fops.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_fops.c
index c7aef066f2..c51d04af6c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_fops.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_fops.c
@@ -96,8 +96,8 @@ static int atomisp_buf_init(struct vb2_buffer *vb)
 }
 
 static int atomisp_q_one_metadata_buffer(struct atomisp_sub_device *asd,
-	enum atomisp_input_stream_id stream_id,
-	enum ia_css_pipe_id css_pipe_id)
+					 enum atomisp_input_stream_id stream_id,
+					 enum ia_css_pipe_id css_pipe_id)
 {
 	struct atomisp_metadata_buf *metadata_buf;
 	enum atomisp_metadata_type md_type = ATOMISP_MAIN_METADATA;
-- 
2.47.3

On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 12:23:33PM +0000, Joshua Crofts wrote:
> Fix alignment checks in function signatures
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joshua Crofts <joshua.crofts1@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Rebased patch onto the staging-next branch to resolve CI merge conflict.

Wrong branch for this driver, you need to use one from git.linuxtv.org.

> - No functional changes to the code.

Also the comments I gave against v1 are still valid.

Plus now the request you to read Submitting Patches and other process
documentation, so you will know that it is required at least 24h between
versions of the patch to give a chance others to review.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

On Thu, 2 Apr 2026 at 14:54, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote:

> Wrong branch for this driver, you need to use one from git.linuxtv.org.
> Also the comments I gave against v1 are still valid.

I've replied to your comments on the v1 thread.

> Plus now the request you to read Submitting Patches and other process
> documentation, so you will know that it is required at least 24h between
> versions of the patch to give a chance others to review.

Apologies, please drop this patch, still learning the process. Thank you for
your time.

Kind regards

CJD