Add mailbox node that describes AP-to-APM mailbox, that can be
used for communicating with APM co-processor on Exynos850 SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi
index cb55015c8dce..fcb665ccc7ae 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi
@@ -298,6 +298,15 @@ cmu_apm: clock-controller@11800000 {
clock-names = "oscclk", "dout_clkcmu_apm_bus";
};
+ ap2apm_mailbox: mailbox@11900000 {
+ compatible = "samsung,exynos850-mbox";
+ reg = <0x11900000 0x1000>;
+ clocks = <&cmu_apm CLK_GOUT_MAILBOX_APM_AP_PCLK>;
+ clock-names = "pclk";
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 49 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ #mbox-cells = <0>;
+ };
+
cmu_cmgp: clock-controller@11c00000 {
compatible = "samsung,exynos850-cmu-cmgp";
reg = <0x11c00000 0x8000>;
--
2.51.0
On 4/2/26 5:20 AM, Alexey Klimov wrote:
> Add mailbox node that describes AP-to-APM mailbox, that can be
okay so here it's AP-to-APM mailbox.
> used for communicating with APM co-processor on Exynos850 SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi
> index cb55015c8dce..fcb665ccc7ae 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi
> @@ -298,6 +298,15 @@ cmu_apm: clock-controller@11800000 {
> clock-names = "oscclk", "dout_clkcmu_apm_bus";
> };
>
> + ap2apm_mailbox: mailbox@11900000 {
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos850-mbox";
> + reg = <0x11900000 0x1000>;
> + clocks = <&cmu_apm CLK_GOUT_MAILBOX_APM_AP_PCLK>;
> + clock-names = "pclk";
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 49 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + #mbox-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
lgtm:
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
> cmu_cmgp: clock-controller@11c00000 {
> compatible = "samsung,exynos850-cmu-cmgp";
> reg = <0x11c00000 0x8000>;
>
On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 03:20:16AM +0100, Alexey Klimov wrote: > Add mailbox node that describes AP-to-APM mailbox, that can be > used for communicating with APM co-processor on Exynos850 SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@linaro.org> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi | 9 +++++++++ What DTS is doing in the middle of the patchset? If there is going to be resend, then fix the order. If the order is intended, then most likely NAK but I need somewhere explanation (but I really do not see the need for it). Please read submitting patches (both documents). Best regards, Krzysztof
On Thu Apr 2, 2026 at 9:01 AM BST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 03:20:16AM +0100, Alexey Klimov wrote: >> Add mailbox node that describes AP-to-APM mailbox, that can be >> used for communicating with APM co-processor on Exynos850 SoCs. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@linaro.org> >> --- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi | 9 +++++++++ > > What DTS is doing in the middle of the patchset? If there is going to be > resend, then fix the order. If the order is intended, then most likely > NAK but I need somewhere explanation (but I really do not see the need > for it). > > Please read submitting patches (both documents). The dts change goes last in this series, the commit 3 out of 3. There is no DTS changes in the middle of the patchset as far as I can trust my eyes. If the order in this series is NACK, please explain why. I suspect that potential confusion is because 2 clock patches from prev series were accepted/merged, so dts change shifted from its 5th place to 3-rd place. BR, Alexey.
On 02/04/2026 15:30, Alexey Klimov wrote: > On Thu Apr 2, 2026 at 9:01 AM BST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 03:20:16AM +0100, Alexey Klimov wrote: >>> Add mailbox node that describes AP-to-APM mailbox, that can be >>> used for communicating with APM co-processor on Exynos850 SoCs. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@linaro.org> >>> --- >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi | 9 +++++++++ >> >> What DTS is doing in the middle of the patchset? If there is going to be >> resend, then fix the order. If the order is intended, then most likely >> NAK but I need somewhere explanation (but I really do not see the need >> for it). >> >> Please read submitting patches (both documents). > > The dts change goes last in this series, the commit 3 out of 3. > There is no DTS changes in the middle of the patchset as far as I can > trust my eyes. > > If the order in this series is NACK, please explain why. > I suspect that potential confusion is because 2 clock patches from > prev series were accepted/merged, so dts change shifted from its 5th > place to 3-rd place. Oops, It is at the end! mutt does not order them by default when loaded via b4, so it appeared in the middle and I did not pay attention enough. Best regards, Krzysztof
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.