[PATCH net-next v3 2/3] dpll: add frequency monitoring callback ops

Ivan Vecera posted 3 patches 13 hours ago
[PATCH net-next v3 2/3] dpll: add frequency monitoring callback ops
Posted by Ivan Vecera 13 hours ago
Add new callback operations for a dpll device:
- freq_monitor_get(..) - to obtain current state of frequency monitor
  feature from dpll device,
- freq_monitor_set(..) - to allow feature configuration.

Add new callback operation for a dpll pin:
- measured_freq_get(..) - to obtain the measured frequency in mHz.

Obtain the feature state value using the get callback and provide it to
the user if the device driver implements callbacks. The measured_freq_get
pin callback is only invoked when the frequency monitor is enabled.
The freq_monitor_get device callback is required when measured_freq_get
is provided by the driver.

Execute the set callback upon user requests.

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
---
Changes v2 -> v3:
- Made freq_monitor_get required when measured_freq_get is present (Jakub)

Changes v1 -> v2:
- Renamed actual-frequency to measured-frequency (Vadim)
---
 drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/dpll.h        | 10 ++++
 2 files changed, 102 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
index 83cbd64abf5a4..576d0cd074bd4 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
@@ -175,6 +175,26 @@ dpll_msg_add_phase_offset_monitor(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int
+dpll_msg_add_freq_monitor(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
+			  struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+	const struct dpll_device_ops *ops = dpll_device_ops(dpll);
+	enum dpll_feature_state state;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (ops->freq_monitor_set && ops->freq_monitor_get) {
+		ret = ops->freq_monitor_get(dpll, dpll_priv(dpll),
+					    &state, extack);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+		if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLL_A_FREQUENCY_MONITOR, state))
+			return -EMSGSIZE;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int
 dpll_msg_add_phase_offset_avg_factor(struct sk_buff *msg,
 				     struct dpll_device *dpll,
@@ -400,6 +420,40 @@ static int dpll_msg_add_ffo(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
 			    ffo);
 }
 
+static int dpll_msg_add_measured_freq(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
+				      struct dpll_pin_ref *ref,
+				      struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+	const struct dpll_device_ops *dev_ops = dpll_device_ops(ref->dpll);
+	const struct dpll_pin_ops *ops = dpll_pin_ops(ref);
+	struct dpll_device *dpll = ref->dpll;
+	enum dpll_feature_state state;
+	u64 measured_freq;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!ops->measured_freq_get)
+		return 0;
+	if (WARN_ON(!dev_ops->freq_monitor_get))
+		return -EINVAL;
+	ret = dev_ops->freq_monitor_get(dpll, dpll_priv(dpll),
+					&state, extack);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	if (state == DPLL_FEATURE_STATE_DISABLE)
+		return 0;
+	ret = ops->measured_freq_get(pin, dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv(dpll, pin),
+				    dpll, dpll_priv(dpll), &measured_freq,
+				    extack);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	if (nla_put_64bit(msg, DPLL_A_PIN_MEASURED_FREQUENCY,
+			  sizeof(measured_freq), &measured_freq,
+			  DPLL_A_PIN_PAD))
+		return -EMSGSIZE;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int
 dpll_msg_add_pin_freq(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
 		      struct dpll_pin_ref *ref, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
@@ -670,6 +724,9 @@ dpll_cmd_pin_get_one(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 	ret = dpll_msg_add_ffo(msg, pin, ref, extack);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = dpll_msg_add_measured_freq(msg, pin, ref, extack);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 	ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_esync(msg, pin, ref, extack);
@@ -722,6 +779,9 @@ dpll_device_get_one(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct sk_buff *msg,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 	ret = dpll_msg_add_phase_offset_avg_factor(msg, dpll, extack);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = dpll_msg_add_freq_monitor(msg, dpll, extack);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -948,6 +1008,32 @@ dpll_phase_offset_avg_factor_set(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct nlattr *a,
 						extack);
 }
 
+static int
+dpll_freq_monitor_set(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct nlattr *a,
+		      struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+	const struct dpll_device_ops *ops = dpll_device_ops(dpll);
+	enum dpll_feature_state state = nla_get_u32(a), old_state;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!(ops->freq_monitor_set && ops->freq_monitor_get)) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, a,
+				    "dpll device not capable of frequency monitor");
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+	ret = ops->freq_monitor_get(dpll, dpll_priv(dpll), &old_state,
+				    extack);
+	if (ret) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
+			       "unable to get current state of frequency monitor");
+		return ret;
+	}
+	if (state == old_state)
+		return 0;
+
+	return ops->freq_monitor_set(dpll, dpll_priv(dpll), state, extack);
+}
+
 static int
 dpll_pin_freq_set(struct dpll_pin *pin, struct nlattr *a,
 		  struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
@@ -1878,6 +1964,12 @@ dpll_set_from_nlattr(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct genl_info *info)
 			if (ret)
 				return ret;
 			break;
+		case DPLL_A_FREQUENCY_MONITOR:
+			ret = dpll_freq_monitor_set(dpll, a,
+						    info->extack);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+			break;
 		}
 	}
 
diff --git a/include/linux/dpll.h b/include/linux/dpll.h
index 2ce295b46b8cd..b7277a8b484d2 100644
--- a/include/linux/dpll.h
+++ b/include/linux/dpll.h
@@ -52,6 +52,12 @@ struct dpll_device_ops {
 	int (*phase_offset_avg_factor_get)(const struct dpll_device *dpll,
 					   void *dpll_priv, u32 *factor,
 					   struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
+	int (*freq_monitor_set)(const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *dpll_priv,
+				enum dpll_feature_state state,
+				struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
+	int (*freq_monitor_get)(const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *dpll_priv,
+				enum dpll_feature_state *state,
+				struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
 };
 
 struct dpll_pin_ops {
@@ -110,6 +116,10 @@ struct dpll_pin_ops {
 	int (*ffo_get)(const struct dpll_pin *pin, void *pin_priv,
 		       const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *dpll_priv,
 		       s64 *ffo, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
+	int (*measured_freq_get)(const struct dpll_pin *pin, void *pin_priv,
+				 const struct dpll_device *dpll,
+				 void *dpll_priv, u64 *measured_freq,
+				 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
 	int (*esync_set)(const struct dpll_pin *pin, void *pin_priv,
 			 const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *dpll_priv,
 			 u64 freq, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
-- 
2.52.0
Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] dpll: add frequency monitoring callback ops
Posted by Vadim Fedorenko 7 hours ago
On 01/04/2026 10:12, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> Add new callback operations for a dpll device:
> - freq_monitor_get(..) - to obtain current state of frequency monitor
>    feature from dpll device,
> - freq_monitor_set(..) - to allow feature configuration.
> 
> Add new callback operation for a dpll pin:
> - measured_freq_get(..) - to obtain the measured frequency in mHz.
> 
> Obtain the feature state value using the get callback and provide it to
> the user if the device driver implements callbacks. The measured_freq_get
> pin callback is only invoked when the frequency monitor is enabled.
> The freq_monitor_get device callback is required when measured_freq_get
> is provided by the driver.
> 
> Execute the set callback upon user requests.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
> ---
> Changes v2 -> v3:
> - Made freq_monitor_get required when measured_freq_get is present (Jakub)
> 
> Changes v1 -> v2:
> - Renamed actual-frequency to measured-frequency (Vadim)
> ---
>   drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   include/linux/dpll.h        | 10 ++++
>   2 files changed, 102 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
> index 83cbd64abf5a4..576d0cd074bd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
> @@ -175,6 +175,26 @@ dpll_msg_add_phase_offset_monitor(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static int
> +dpll_msg_add_freq_monitor(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
> +			  struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> +	const struct dpll_device_ops *ops = dpll_device_ops(dpll);
> +	enum dpll_feature_state state;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (ops->freq_monitor_set && ops->freq_monitor_get) {
> +		ret = ops->freq_monitor_get(dpll, dpll_priv(dpll),
> +					    &state, extack);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +		if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLL_A_FREQUENCY_MONITOR, state))
> +			return -EMSGSIZE;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static int
>   dpll_msg_add_phase_offset_avg_factor(struct sk_buff *msg,
>   				     struct dpll_device *dpll,
> @@ -400,6 +420,40 @@ static int dpll_msg_add_ffo(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>   			    ffo);
>   }
>   
> +static int dpll_msg_add_measured_freq(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
> +				      struct dpll_pin_ref *ref,
> +				      struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> +	const struct dpll_device_ops *dev_ops = dpll_device_ops(ref->dpll);
> +	const struct dpll_pin_ops *ops = dpll_pin_ops(ref);
> +	struct dpll_device *dpll = ref->dpll;
> +	enum dpll_feature_state state;
> +	u64 measured_freq;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!ops->measured_freq_get)
> +		return 0;
> +	if (WARN_ON(!dev_ops->freq_monitor_get))
> +		return -EINVAL;

I think pin registration function has to be adjusted to not allow
measured_freq_get() callback if device doesn't have freq_monitor_get()
callback (or both freq_monitor_{s,g}et). Then this defensive part can
be completely removed.

> +	ret = dev_ops->freq_monitor_get(dpll, dpll_priv(dpll),
Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] dpll: add frequency monitoring callback ops
Posted by Ivan Vecera 6 hours ago
Hi Vadim,

1. dubna 2026 16:47:21 SELČ, Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev> napsal:
>On 01/04/2026 10:12, Ivan Vecera wrote:
>> Add new callback operations for a dpll device:
>> - freq_monitor_get(..) - to obtain current state of frequency monitor
>>    feature from dpll device,
>> - freq_monitor_set(..) - to allow feature configuration.
>> 
>> Add new callback operation for a dpll pin:
>> - measured_freq_get(..) - to obtain the measured frequency in mHz.
>> 
>> Obtain the feature state value using the get callback and provide it to
>> the user if the device driver implements callbacks. The measured_freq_get
>> pin callback is only invoked when the frequency monitor is enabled.
>> The freq_monitor_get device callback is required when measured_freq_get
>> is provided by the driver.
>> 
>> Execute the set callback upon user requests.
>> 
>> Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> Changes v2 -> v3:
>> - Made freq_monitor_get required when measured_freq_get is present (Jakub)
>> 
>> Changes v1 -> v2:
>> - Renamed actual-frequency to measured-frequency (Vadim)
>> ---
>>   drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   include/linux/dpll.h        | 10 ++++
>>   2 files changed, 102 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
>> index 83cbd64abf5a4..576d0cd074bd4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
>> @@ -175,6 +175,26 @@ dpll_msg_add_phase_offset_monitor(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   +static int
>> +dpll_msg_add_freq_monitor(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> +			  struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> +{
>> +	const struct dpll_device_ops *ops = dpll_device_ops(dpll);
>> +	enum dpll_feature_state state;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	if (ops->freq_monitor_set && ops->freq_monitor_get) {
>> +		ret = ops->freq_monitor_get(dpll, dpll_priv(dpll),
>> +					    &state, extack);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			return ret;
>> +		if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLL_A_FREQUENCY_MONITOR, state))
>> +			return -EMSGSIZE;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int
>>   dpll_msg_add_phase_offset_avg_factor(struct sk_buff *msg,
>>   				     struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> @@ -400,6 +420,40 @@ static int dpll_msg_add_ffo(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>>   			    ffo);
>>   }
>>   +static int dpll_msg_add_measured_freq(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> +				      struct dpll_pin_ref *ref,
>> +				      struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> +{
>> +	const struct dpll_device_ops *dev_ops = dpll_device_ops(ref->dpll);
>> +	const struct dpll_pin_ops *ops = dpll_pin_ops(ref);
>> +	struct dpll_device *dpll = ref->dpll;
>> +	enum dpll_feature_state state;
>> +	u64 measured_freq;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	if (!ops->measured_freq_get)
>> +		return 0;
>> +	if (WARN_ON(!dev_ops->freq_monitor_get))
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>
>I think pin registration function has to be adjusted to not allow
>measured_freq_get() callback if device doesn't have freq_monitor_get()
>callback (or both freq_monitor_{s,g}et). Then this defensive part can
>be completely removed.

Ok, make sense... Will move such check to pin registration function...

Q: with WARN_ON or without?

Thanks 
Ivan
Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] dpll: add frequency monitoring callback ops
Posted by Vadim Fedorenko 5 hours ago
On 01/04/2026 17:29, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> Hi Vadim,
> 
> 1. dubna 2026 16:47:21 SELČ, Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev> napsal:
>> On 01/04/2026 10:12, Ivan Vecera wrote:
>>> Add new callback operations for a dpll device:
>>> - freq_monitor_get(..) - to obtain current state of frequency monitor
>>>     feature from dpll device,
>>> - freq_monitor_set(..) - to allow feature configuration.
>>>
>>> Add new callback operation for a dpll pin:
>>> - measured_freq_get(..) - to obtain the measured frequency in mHz.
>>>
>>> Obtain the feature state value using the get callback and provide it to
>>> the user if the device driver implements callbacks. The measured_freq_get
>>> pin callback is only invoked when the frequency monitor is enabled.
>>> The freq_monitor_get device callback is required when measured_freq_get
>>> is provided by the driver.
>>>
>>> Execute the set callback upon user requests.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes v2 -> v3:
>>> - Made freq_monitor_get required when measured_freq_get is present (Jakub)
>>>
>>> Changes v1 -> v2:
>>> - Renamed actual-frequency to measured-frequency (Vadim)
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    include/linux/dpll.h        | 10 ++++
>>>    2 files changed, 102 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
>>> index 83cbd64abf5a4..576d0cd074bd4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
>>> @@ -175,6 +175,26 @@ dpll_msg_add_phase_offset_monitor(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
>>>    	return 0;
>>>    }
>>>    +static int
>>> +dpll_msg_add_freq_monitor(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
>>> +			  struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>> +{
>>> +	const struct dpll_device_ops *ops = dpll_device_ops(dpll);
>>> +	enum dpll_feature_state state;
>>> +	int ret;
>>> +
>>> +	if (ops->freq_monitor_set && ops->freq_monitor_get) {
>>> +		ret = ops->freq_monitor_get(dpll, dpll_priv(dpll),
>>> +					    &state, extack);
>>> +		if (ret)
>>> +			return ret;
>>> +		if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLL_A_FREQUENCY_MONITOR, state))
>>> +			return -EMSGSIZE;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    static int
>>>    dpll_msg_add_phase_offset_avg_factor(struct sk_buff *msg,
>>>    				     struct dpll_device *dpll,
>>> @@ -400,6 +420,40 @@ static int dpll_msg_add_ffo(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>>>    			    ffo);
>>>    }
>>>    +static int dpll_msg_add_measured_freq(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>>> +				      struct dpll_pin_ref *ref,
>>> +				      struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>> +{
>>> +	const struct dpll_device_ops *dev_ops = dpll_device_ops(ref->dpll);
>>> +	const struct dpll_pin_ops *ops = dpll_pin_ops(ref);
>>> +	struct dpll_device *dpll = ref->dpll;
>>> +	enum dpll_feature_state state;
>>> +	u64 measured_freq;
>>> +	int ret;
>>> +
>>> +	if (!ops->measured_freq_get)
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +	if (WARN_ON(!dev_ops->freq_monitor_get))
>>> +		return -EINVAL;
>>
>> I think pin registration function has to be adjusted to not allow
>> measured_freq_get() callback if device doesn't have freq_monitor_get()
>> callback (or both freq_monitor_{s,g}et). Then this defensive part can
>> be completely removed.
> 
> Ok, make sense... Will move such check to pin registration function...
> 
> Q: with WARN_ON or without?

Well, we have to provide reason for blocking device registration
somehow, and the only way to this is via "WARN_ON"...

> 
> Thanks
> Ivan
>