Make the static fix_id array const-qualified so it can be placed
in read-only memory.

Signed-off-by: Hungyu Lin <dennylin0707@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
index 62f6e0cdf..795e9164b 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
@@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ static int lynxfb_set_fbinfo(struct fb_info *info, int index)
 		"kernel HELPERS prepared vesa_modes",
 	};
 
-	static const char *fix_id[2] = {
+	static const char * const fix_id[2] = {
 		"sm750_fb1", "sm750_fb2",
 	};
 
-- 
2.34.1

On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 01:43:49PM +0000, Hungyu Lin wrote:
> Make the static fix_id array const-qualified so it can be placed
> in read-only memory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hungyu Lin <dennylin0707@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
> index 62f6e0cdf..795e9164b 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
> @@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ static int lynxfb_set_fbinfo(struct fb_info *info, int index)
>  		"kernel HELPERS prepared vesa_modes",
>  	};
>  
> -	static const char *fix_id[2] = {
> +	static const char * const fix_id[2] = {
>  		"sm750_fb1", "sm750_fb2",
>  	};
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
  did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
  Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
  kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
  needs to be done here to properly describe this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot