[v2] Add SIM pbias regulator support for USB on OMAP4

[PATCH v2 02/11] dt-bindings: regulator: ti,pbias-regulator: Add pbias_sim_omap4 regulator

Posted by Thomas Richard 6 days, 19 hours ago

Define pbias_sim_omap4 regulator for OMAP4. This regulators drives SIM_VDDS
supply and allows to unlock USB I/O cell.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@bootlin.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/ti,pbias-regulator.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/ti,pbias-regulator.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/ti,pbias-regulator.yaml
index 3e020d87701b..908fbb46b5cf 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/ti,pbias-regulator.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/ti,pbias-regulator.yaml
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ allOf:
               contains:
                 enum:
                   - pbias_mmc_omap4
+                  - pbias_sim_omap4
 
   - if:
       properties:

-- 
2.53.0

Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] dt-bindings: regulator: ti,pbias-regulator: Add pbias_sim_omap4 regulator

Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 6 days ago

On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 03:43:59PM +0200, Thomas Richard wrote:
> Define pbias_sim_omap4 regulator for OMAP4. This regulators drives SIM_VDDS
> supply and allows to unlock USB I/O cell.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@bootlin.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/ti,pbias-regulator.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/ti,pbias-regulator.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/ti,pbias-regulator.yaml
> index 3e020d87701b..908fbb46b5cf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/ti,pbias-regulator.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/ti,pbias-regulator.yaml
> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ allOf:
>                contains:
>                  enum:
>                    - pbias_mmc_omap4
> +                  - pbias_sim_omap4

Names cannot be fixed, because they represent different board naming.
Why growing the deprecated style?

Best regards,
Krzysztof