Add new SCMI v4.0 Telemetry protocol bindings definitions.

Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
---
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
index be817fd9cc34..e936ae7c0fb9 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
@@ -298,6 +298,14 @@ properties:
       reg:
         const: 0x19
 
+  protocol@1B:
+    $ref: '#/$defs/protocol-node'
+    unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+    properties:
+      reg:
+        const: 0x1B
+
     patternProperties:
       '-pins$':
         type: object
-- 
2.53.0

On Sun, Mar 29, 2026 at 05:33:17PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Add new SCMI v4.0 Telemetry protocol bindings definitions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> ---
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>
> Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> index be817fd9cc34..e936ae7c0fb9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> @@ -298,6 +298,14 @@ properties:
>        reg:
>          const: 0x19
>  
> +  protocol@1B:

It's always lowercase hex in DTS.

> +    $ref: '#/$defs/protocol-node'
> +    unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +    properties:
> +      reg:
> +        const: 0x1B

Here as well.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

On Sun, 29 Mar 2026 17:33:17 +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Add new SCMI v4.0 Telemetry protocol bindings definitions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> ---
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>
> Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 

My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:

yamllint warnings/errors:

dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
/builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.example.dtb: scmi (arm,scmi): protocol@19: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('i2c2-pins', 'keys-pins', 'mdio-pins' were unexpected)
	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml

doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):

See https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/devicetree/patch/20260329163337.637393-7-cristian.marussi@arm.com

The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
should be noted in *this* patch.

If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
date:

pip3 install dtschema --upgrade

Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note
that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking
your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.

On Sun, Mar 29, 2026 at 12:31:33PM -0500, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 29 Mar 2026 17:33:17 +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> > Add new SCMI v4.0 Telemetry protocol bindings definitions.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> > ---
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
> > Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml | 8 ++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > 
> 
> My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:
> 
> yamllint warnings/errors:
> 
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.example.dtb: scmi (arm,scmi): protocol@19: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('i2c2-pins', 'keys-pins', 'mdio-pins' were unexpected)
> 	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> 
> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
> 
> See https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/devicetree/patch/20260329163337.637393-7-cristian.marussi@arm.com
> 
> The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
> should be noted in *this* patch.
> 
> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
> error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
> date:
> 
> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
> 

Yes...the new protocol block definition ended up intermixed with the
previous protocol block...totally wrong.

My bad.

I will fix in V4.

Thanks,
Cristian

On 29/03/2026 20:00, Cristian Marussi wrote:
>>
>> My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:
>>
>> yamllint warnings/errors:
>>
>> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
>> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.example.dtb: scmi (arm,scmi): protocol@19: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('i2c2-pins', 'keys-pins', 'mdio-pins' were unexpected)
>> 	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
>>
>> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
>>
>> See https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/devicetree/patch/20260329163337.637393-7-cristian.marussi@arm.com
>>
>> The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
>> should be noted in *this* patch.
>>
>> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
>> error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
>> date:
>>
>> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
>>
> 
> Yes...the new protocol block definition ended up intermixed with the
> previous protocol block...totally wrong.

This is not a problem. Problem was that you did not test it and sent
completely untested code to mailing list.

Add "RFC" prefix you subjects so we know that we can ignore the patchset
in the future.

Best regards,
Krzysztof