The '#reset-cells' property is permitted for the SM6125 SoC clock
controllers, but not listed as a valid property.

Fixes: bb4d28e377cf ("arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Add missing MDSS core reset")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603150629.GYoouFwZ-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Biswapriyo Nath <nathbappai@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml
index ef2b1e204430..0d467c1f30ed 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml
@@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ properties:
   '#clock-cells':
     const: 1
 
+  '#reset-cells':
+    const: 1
+
   '#power-domain-cells':
     const: 1
 

-- 
2.53.0

On Sun, Mar 29, 2026 at 04:47:57AM +0000, Biswapriyo Nath wrote:
> The '#reset-cells' property is permitted for the SM6125 SoC clock
> controllers, but not listed as a valid property.

Any reason why this binding file is the only dispcc not referencing
qcom,gcc.yaml? It should and it would solve the error. Look at other
files.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

On 29/03/2026 11:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2026 at 04:47:57AM +0000, Biswapriyo Nath wrote:
>> The '#reset-cells' property is permitted for the SM6125 SoC clock
>> controllers, but not listed as a valid property.
> 
> Any reason why this binding file is the only dispcc not referencing
> qcom,gcc.yaml? It should and it would solve the error. Look at other
> files.

... and you also need to update the example.

Best regards,
Krzysztof