mm/hugetlb.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
In alloc_hugetlb_folio(), a single h_cg pointer is used for both
the rsvd and non-rsvd hugetlb cgroup charges. When map_chg is set,
hugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup_rsvd() stores the charged cgroup in
h_cg, but the immediately following hugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup()
overwrites h_cg with the non-rsvd cgroup pointer.
As a result, hugetlb_cgroup_commit_charge_rsvd() stores the wrong
(non-rsvd) cgroup pointer into the folio's rsvd slot.
When the folio is later freed, free_huge_folio() unconditionally
calls both hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio() and
hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio_rsvd(). The rsvd uncharge reads back
the wrong cgroup from the folio and decrements a counter that was
never charged for that cgroup, causing a page_counter underflow:
page_counter underflow: -512 nr_pages=512
WARNING: mm/page_counter.c:61 at page_counter_cancel
Fix this by introducing a separate h_cg_rsvd pointer exclusively
for the rsvd charge path, keeping the rsvd and non-rsvd charges
fully independent through their charge, commit, and error uncharge
paths.
Fixes: 08cf9faf7558 ("hugetlb_cgroup: support noreserve mappings")
Reported-by: syzbot+226c1f947186f8fef796@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=226c1f947186f8fef796
Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 327eaa4074d3..5be36a888e70 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -2915,6 +2915,7 @@ struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
map_chg_state map_chg;
int ret, idx;
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg = NULL;
+ struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg_rsvd = NULL;
gfp_t gfp = htlb_alloc_mask(h) | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL;
idx = hstate_index(h);
@@ -2965,7 +2966,7 @@ struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
*/
if (map_chg) {
ret = hugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup_rsvd(
- idx, pages_per_huge_page(h), &h_cg);
+ idx, pages_per_huge_page(h), &h_cg_rsvd);
if (ret)
goto out_subpool_put;
}
@@ -3007,7 +3008,7 @@ struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
*/
if (map_chg) {
hugetlb_cgroup_commit_charge_rsvd(idx, pages_per_huge_page(h),
- h_cg, folio);
+ h_cg_rsvd, folio);
}
spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
@@ -3059,7 +3060,7 @@ struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
out_uncharge_cgroup_reservation:
if (map_chg)
hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_cgroup_rsvd(idx, pages_per_huge_page(h),
- h_cg);
+ h_cg_rsvd);
out_subpool_put:
/*
* put page to subpool iff the quota of subpool's rsv_hpages is used
--
2.43.0
On Sat, 28 Mar 2026 12:25:34 +0530 Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com> wrote:
> In alloc_hugetlb_folio(), a single h_cg pointer is used for both
> the rsvd and non-rsvd hugetlb cgroup charges. When map_chg is set,
> hugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup_rsvd() stores the charged cgroup in
> h_cg, but the immediately following hugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup()
> overwrites h_cg with the non-rsvd cgroup pointer.
>
> As a result, hugetlb_cgroup_commit_charge_rsvd() stores the wrong
> (non-rsvd) cgroup pointer into the folio's rsvd slot.
>
> When the folio is later freed, free_huge_folio() unconditionally
> calls both hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio() and
> hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio_rsvd(). The rsvd uncharge reads back
> the wrong cgroup from the folio and decrements a counter that was
> never charged for that cgroup, causing a page_counter underflow:
>
> page_counter underflow: -512 nr_pages=512
> WARNING: mm/page_counter.c:61 at page_counter_cancel
>
> Fix this by introducing a separate h_cg_rsvd pointer exclusively
> for the rsvd charge path, keeping the rsvd and non-rsvd charges
> fully independent through their charge, commit, and error uncharge
> paths.
Thanks.
> Fixes: 08cf9faf7558 ("hugetlb_cgroup: support noreserve mappings")
Merged in 2020!
Could reviewers please give consideration to whether we should backport
this?
> Reported-by: syzbot+226c1f947186f8fef796@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=226c1f947186f8fef796
> Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
This doesn't seem super-urgent so for now I'll park it in my pile to
revisit after 7.1-rc1.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.