tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_dio.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
hugetlb_dio test uses sub-page offsets (pagesize / 2) to verify that
hugepages used as DIO user buffers are correctly unpinned at completion.
However, on filesystems with a logical block size larger than half the
page size (e.g., 4K-sector block devices), these unaligned DIO writes
are rejected with -EINVAL, causing the test to fail unexpectedly.
Add check_dio_alignment() which queries the filesystem's DIO alignment
requirement via statx(STATX_DIOALIGN) and skips the test early if the
sub-page offset used by the test is not compatible with the alignment
constraint.
=== Reproduce Steps ===
# dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/test.img bs=1M count=512
# losetup --sector-size 4096 /dev/loop0 /tmp/test.img
# mkfs.xfs /dev/loop0
# mkdir -p /mnt/dio_test
# mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/dio_test
// Modify test to open /mnt/dio_test and rebuild it:
- fd = open("/tmp", O_TMPFILE | O_RDWR | O_DIRECT, 0664);
+ fd = open("/mnt/dio_test", O_TMPFILE | O_RDWR | O_DIRECT, 0664);
# getconf PAGESIZE
4096
# echo 100 >/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
# ./hugetlb_dio
TAP version 13
1..4
# No. Free pages before allocation : 100
# No. Free pages after munmap : 100
ok 1 free huge pages from 0-12288
Bail out! Error writing to file
: Invalid argument (22)
# Planned tests != run tests (4 != 1)
# Totals: pass:1 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_dio.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_dio.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_dio.c
index 9ac62eb4c97d..afcca50d190e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_dio.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_dio.c
@@ -20,6 +20,31 @@
#include "vm_util.h"
#include "kselftest.h"
+#ifndef STATX_DIOALIGN
+#define STATX_DIOALIGN 0x00002000U
+#endif
+
+void check_dio_alignment(size_t pagesize)
+{
+ int fd;
+ struct statx stx;
+ unsigned int dio_align = 1;
+
+ fd = open("/tmp", O_TMPFILE | O_RDWR, 0664);
+ if (fd < 0)
+ ksft_exit_skip("Unable to allocate file: %s\n", strerror(errno));
+
+ if (statx(fd, "", AT_EMPTY_PATH, STATX_DIOALIGN, &stx) == 0 &&
+ (stx.stx_mask & STATX_DIOALIGN))
+ dio_align = stx.stx_dio_offset_align;
+
+ close(fd);
+
+ if ((pagesize / 2) % dio_align != 0)
+ ksft_exit_skip("DIO alignment (%u) incompatible with sub-page offset %lu\n",
+ dio_align, pagesize / 2);
+}
+
void run_dio_using_hugetlb(unsigned int start_off, unsigned int end_off)
{
int fd;
@@ -89,16 +114,11 @@ void run_dio_using_hugetlb(unsigned int start_off, unsigned int end_off)
int main(void)
{
- size_t pagesize = 0;
- int fd;
+ size_t pagesize = psize();
ksft_print_header();
- /* Open the file to DIO */
- fd = open("/tmp", O_TMPFILE | O_RDWR | O_DIRECT, 0664);
- if (fd < 0)
- ksft_exit_skip("Unable to allocate file: %s\n", strerror(errno));
- close(fd);
+ check_dio_alignment(pagesize);
/* Check if huge pages are free */
if (!get_free_hugepages())
@@ -106,9 +126,6 @@ int main(void)
ksft_set_plan(4);
- /* Get base page size */
- pagesize = psize();
-
/* start and end is aligned to pagesize */
run_dio_using_hugetlb(0, (pagesize * 3));
--
2.53.0
On Fri, 27 Mar 2026 11:12:43 +0800 Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com> wrote: > hugetlb_dio test uses sub-page offsets (pagesize / 2) to verify that > hugepages used as DIO user buffers are correctly unpinned at completion. > > However, on filesystems with a logical block size larger than half the > page size (e.g., 4K-sector block devices), these unaligned DIO writes > are rejected with -EINVAL, causing the test to fail unexpectedly. > > Add check_dio_alignment() which queries the filesystem's DIO alignment > requirement via statx(STATX_DIOALIGN) and skips the test early if the > sub-page offset used by the test is not compatible with the alignment > constraint. AI review askes questions: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260327031243.15903-1-liwang@redhat.com The glibc one is worthwhile, I suppose. glibc-2.37 was released Feb 2023. I'd ignore the filesystem-doesn't-support-directio ones. If someone's running a dio test against such a filesystem then Don't Do That. And yes please, %zu.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 11:12:43AM +0800, Li Wang wrote:
> hugetlb_dio test uses sub-page offsets (pagesize / 2) to verify that
> hugepages used as DIO user buffers are correctly unpinned at completion.
>
> However, on filesystems with a logical block size larger than half the
> page size (e.g., 4K-sector block devices), these unaligned DIO writes
> are rejected with -EINVAL, causing the test to fail unexpectedly.
>
> Add check_dio_alignment() which queries the filesystem's DIO alignment
> requirement via statx(STATX_DIOALIGN) and skips the test early if the
> sub-page offset used by the test is not compatible with the alignment
> constraint.
>
> === Reproduce Steps ===
>
> # dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/test.img bs=1M count=512
> # losetup --sector-size 4096 /dev/loop0 /tmp/test.img
> # mkfs.xfs /dev/loop0
> # mkdir -p /mnt/dio_test
> # mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/dio_test
>
> // Modify test to open /mnt/dio_test and rebuild it:
> - fd = open("/tmp", O_TMPFILE | O_RDWR | O_DIRECT, 0664);
> + fd = open("/mnt/dio_test", O_TMPFILE | O_RDWR | O_DIRECT, 0664);
>
> # getconf PAGESIZE
> 4096
>
> # echo 100 >/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
>
> # ./hugetlb_dio
> TAP version 13
> 1..4
> # No. Free pages before allocation : 100
> # No. Free pages after munmap : 100
> ok 1 free huge pages from 0-12288
> Bail out! Error writing to file
> : Invalid argument (22)
> # Planned tests != run tests (4 != 1)
> # Totals: pass:1 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_dio.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_dio.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_dio.c
> index 9ac62eb4c97d..afcca50d190e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_dio.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_dio.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,31 @@
> #include "vm_util.h"
> #include "kselftest.h"
>
> +#ifndef STATX_DIOALIGN
> +#define STATX_DIOALIGN 0x00002000U
> +#endif
> +
> +void check_dio_alignment(size_t pagesize)
> +{
> + int fd;
> + struct statx stx;
> + unsigned int dio_align = 1;
> +
> + fd = open("/tmp", O_TMPFILE | O_RDWR, 0664);
> + if (fd < 0)
> + ksft_exit_skip("Unable to allocate file: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> +
> + if (statx(fd, "", AT_EMPTY_PATH, STATX_DIOALIGN, &stx) == 0 &&
> + (stx.stx_mask & STATX_DIOALIGN))
> + dio_align = stx.stx_dio_offset_align;
> +
> + close(fd);
> +
> + if ((pagesize / 2) % dio_align != 0)
> + ksft_exit_skip("DIO alignment (%u) incompatible with sub-page offset %lu\n",
> + dio_align, pagesize / 2);
This also needlessly skips the test with aligned offsets.
I'd suggest detecting dio_align here, passing it to run_dio_using_hugetlb()
and moving the check that skips a test there.
> +}
> +
> void run_dio_using_hugetlb(unsigned int start_off, unsigned int end_off)
> {
> int fd;
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_dio.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_dio.c
> > @@ -20,6 +20,31 @@
> > #include "vm_util.h"
> > #include "kselftest.h"
> >
> > +#ifndef STATX_DIOALIGN
> > +#define STATX_DIOALIGN 0x00002000U
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +void check_dio_alignment(size_t pagesize)
> > +{
> > + int fd;
> > + struct statx stx;
> > + unsigned int dio_align = 1;
> > +
> > + fd = open("/tmp", O_TMPFILE | O_RDWR, 0664);
> > + if (fd < 0)
> > + ksft_exit_skip("Unable to allocate file: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> > +
> > + if (statx(fd, "", AT_EMPTY_PATH, STATX_DIOALIGN, &stx) == 0 &&
> > + (stx.stx_mask & STATX_DIOALIGN))
> > + dio_align = stx.stx_dio_offset_align;
> > +
> > + close(fd);
> > +
> > + if ((pagesize / 2) % dio_align != 0)
> > + ksft_exit_skip("DIO alignment (%u) incompatible with sub-page offset %lu\n",
> > + dio_align, pagesize / 2);
>
> This also needlessly skips the test with aligned offsets.
>
> I'd suggest detecting dio_align here, passing it to run_dio_using_hugetlb()
> and moving the check that skips a test there.
Good point, as the first test case use 'pagesize * 3' is fully aligned
and would work fine. But apparently I overlooked that.
Also, Sashiko reminder few minor issues, which I would fix them in next
version as well.
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260327031243.15903-1-liwang%40redhat.com
--
Regards,
Li Wang
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.