[v3 16/24] mm: huge_mm: Make sure all split_huge_pmd calls are checked

Usama Arif posted 24 patches 6 days, 16 hours ago
[v3 16/24] mm: huge_mm: Make sure all split_huge_pmd calls are checked
Posted by Usama Arif 6 days, 16 hours ago
Mark __split_huge_pmd(), split_huge_pmd() and split_huge_pmd_address()
with __must_check so the compiler warns if any caller ignores the return
value. Not checking return value and operating on the basis that the pmd
is split could result in a kernel bug. The possibility of an order-0
allocation failing for page table allocation is very low, but it should
be handled correctly.

Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
---
 include/linux/huge_mm.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
index 224965fce4e66..c4d0badc4ce27 100644
--- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ static inline int split_huge_page(struct page *page)
 extern struct list_lru deferred_split_lru;
 void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio, bool partially_mapped);
 
-int __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
+int __must_check __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
 		unsigned long address, bool freeze);
 
 /**
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ static inline bool pmd_is_huge(pmd_t pmd)
 	return false;
 }
 
-static inline int split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+static inline int __must_check split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 					     pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long address)
 {
 	if (pmd_is_huge(*pmd))
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static inline int split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-int split_huge_pmd_address(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
+int __must_check split_huge_pmd_address(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
 		bool freeze);
 
 void __split_huge_pud(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pud_t *pud,
-- 
2.52.0
Re: [v3 16/24] mm: huge_mm: Make sure all split_huge_pmd calls are checked
Posted by Kiryl Shutsemau 3 days, 4 hours ago
On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 07:08:58PM -0700, Usama Arif wrote:
> Mark __split_huge_pmd(), split_huge_pmd() and split_huge_pmd_address()
> with __must_check so the compiler warns if any caller ignores the return
> value. Not checking return value and operating on the basis that the pmd
> is split could result in a kernel bug. The possibility of an order-0
> allocation failing for page table allocation is very low, but it should
> be handled correctly.

I think we want the same __must_check annotation on stubs for CONFIG_THP=n.

-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov