The '#reset-cells' property is permitted for the SM6125 SoC clock
controllers, but not listed as a valid property.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603150629.GYoouFwZ-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Biswapriyo Nath <nathbappai@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml
index ef2b1e20443..0d467c1f30e 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml
@@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ properties:
   '#clock-cells':
     const: 1
 
+  '#reset-cells':
+    const: 1
+
   '#power-domain-cells':
     const: 1
 

-- 
2.53.0

On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 06:07:30PM +0000, Biswapriyo Nath wrote:
> The '#reset-cells' property is permitted for the SM6125 SoC clock
> controllers, but not listed as a valid property.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603150629.GYoouFwZ-lkp@intel.com/

Fixes?

> Signed-off-by: Biswapriyo Nath <nathbappai@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry