From: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>

Recent changes have removed the hard limitations for using kexec and
TDX together. So remove the section in the TDX docs.

Users on partial write erratums will need an updated TDX module to
handle the rare edge cases. The docs do not currently provide any
guidance on recommended TDX module versions, so don't keep a whole
section around to document this interaction.

Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
---
 Documentation/arch/x86/tdx.rst | 7 -------
 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/tdx.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/tdx.rst
index ff6b110291bc..1a3b5bac1021 100644
--- a/Documentation/arch/x86/tdx.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/tdx.rst
@@ -138,13 +138,6 @@ If the platform has such erratum, the kernel prints additional message in
 machine check handler to tell user the machine check may be caused by
 kernel bug on TDX private memory.
 
-Kexec
-~~~~~~~
-
-Currently kexec doesn't work on the TDX platforms with the aforementioned
-erratum.  It fails when loading the kexec kernel image.  Otherwise it
-works normally.
-
 Interaction vs S3 and deeper states
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 

-- 
2.53.0

On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 02:59:08PM -0600, Vishal Verma wrote:
> From: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
> 
> Recent changes have removed the hard limitations for using kexec and
> TDX together. So remove the section in the TDX docs.
> 
> Users on partial write erratums will need an updated TDX module to
> handle the rare edge cases. The docs do not currently provide any
> guidance on recommended TDX module versions, so don't keep a whole
> section around to document this interaction.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) <kas@kernel.org>

-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov

On Mon, 2026-03-23 at 14:59 -0600, Vishal Verma wrote:
> From: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
> 
> Recent changes have removed the hard limitations for using kexec and
> TDX together. So remove the section in the TDX docs.
> 
> Users on partial write erratums will need an updated TDX module to
> handle the rare edge cases. The docs do not currently provide any
> guidance on recommended TDX module versions, so don't keep a whole
> section around to document this interaction.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> 

Acked-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>