Place constant 0xFF on right side of equality operator when checking
value of hw_channel_plan to fix checkpatch.pl warning and conform with
the Linux Kernel coding style.

Signed-off-by: Prithvi Tambewagh <activprithvi@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com.c
index 31b3e880ae6a..597ba3d283c1 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com.c
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ u8 hal_com_config_channel_plan(
 	pHalData->bDisableSWChannelPlan = false;
 	chnlPlan = def_channel_plan;
 
-	if (0xFF == hw_channel_plan)
+	if (hw_channel_plan == 0xFF)
 		AutoLoadFail = true;
 
 	if (!AutoLoadFail) {

base-commit: 42bddab0563fe67882b2722620a66dd98c8dbf33
-- 
2.34.1

On Sat, Mar 21, 2026 at 02:55:36PM +0530, Prithvi Tambewagh wrote:
> Place constant 0xFF on right side of equality operator when checking
> value of hw_channel_plan to fix checkpatch.pl warning and conform with
> the Linux Kernel coding style.

First of all, in the very same function there are more of a such.
And hence the Q: have you checked the entire driver? Please do.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 11:19:40AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2026 at 02:55:36PM +0530, Prithvi Tambewagh wrote:
> > Place constant 0xFF on right side of equality operator when checking
> > value of hw_channel_plan to fix checkpatch.pl warning and conform with
> > the Linux Kernel coding style.
> 
> First of all, in the very same function there are more of a such.
> And hence the Q: have you checked the entire driver? Please do.
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
> 
> 

Hello Andy,

Thanks for the correction...While checking out other places requiring similar 
change, I observed the other place in the function where constant is on left 
side of equality operator:

	if (
		(false == pHalData->bDisableSWChannelPlan) &&
		rtw_is_channel_plan_valid(sw_channel_plan)
	)
		chnlPlan = sw_channel_plan;

Here, the formatting of if statement can be improved and we can also replace 
	(false == pHalData->bDisableSWChannelPlan) with :

	!pHalData->bDisableSWChannelPlan

Would it be alright to add these changes to v2 of this patch itself since they 
are related to the code having constant on left side of == operator?

Thanks,
Prithvi

On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 06:52:35PM +0530, Prithvi wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 11:19:40AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2026 at 02:55:36PM +0530, Prithvi Tambewagh wrote:
> > > Place constant 0xFF on right side of equality operator when checking
> > > value of hw_channel_plan to fix checkpatch.pl warning and conform with
> > > the Linux Kernel coding style.
> > 
> > First of all, in the very same function there are more of a such.
> > And hence the Q: have you checked the entire driver? Please do.

> Thanks for the correction...While checking out other places requiring similar 
> change, I observed the other place in the function where constant is on left 
> side of equality operator:
> 
> 	if (
> 		(false == pHalData->bDisableSWChannelPlan) &&
> 		rtw_is_channel_plan_valid(sw_channel_plan)
> 	)
> 		chnlPlan = sw_channel_plan;
> 
> Here, the formatting of if statement can be improved and we can also replace 
> 	(false == pHalData->bDisableSWChannelPlan) with :
> 
> 	!pHalData->bDisableSWChannelPlan
> 
> Would it be alright to add these changes to v2 of this patch itself since
> they  are related to the code having constant on left side of == operator?

Yes, but I also meant to go through more files in this driver for the same
style issue.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 03:33:50PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 06:52:35PM +0530, Prithvi wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 11:19:40AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2026 at 02:55:36PM +0530, Prithvi Tambewagh wrote:
> > > > Place constant 0xFF on right side of equality operator when checking
> > > > value of hw_channel_plan to fix checkpatch.pl warning and conform with
> > > > the Linux Kernel coding style.
> > > 
> > > First of all, in the very same function there are more of a such.
> > > And hence the Q: have you checked the entire driver? Please do.
> 
> > Thanks for the correction...While checking out other places requiring similar 
> > change, I observed the other place in the function where constant is on left 
> > side of equality operator:
> > 
> > 	if (
> > 		(false == pHalData->bDisableSWChannelPlan) &&
> > 		rtw_is_channel_plan_valid(sw_channel_plan)
> > 	)
> > 		chnlPlan = sw_channel_plan;
> > 
> > Here, the formatting of if statement can be improved and we can also replace 
> > 	(false == pHalData->bDisableSWChannelPlan) with :
> > 
> > 	!pHalData->bDisableSWChannelPlan
> > 
> > Would it be alright to add these changes to v2 of this patch itself since
> > they  are related to the code having constant on left side of == operator?
> 
> Yes, but I also meant to go through more files in this driver for the same
> style issue.
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
> 
> 

Sure...sorry didn't get it earlier. I will check for checkpatch warnings 
related to constant being on left side of test in the driver and send a 
v2 patch. 

Best Regards,
Prithvi