[PATCH 0/3] Add support for LTC2305

Carlos Jones Jr posted 3 patches 2 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
.../bindings/iio/adc/lltc,ltc2497.yaml        |  9 +++-
drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig                       |  6 +--
drivers/iio/adc/ltc2309.c                     | 45 ++++++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
[PATCH 0/3] Add support for LTC2305
Posted by Carlos Jones Jr 2 weeks ago
The LTC2305 is a 2-channel, 12-bit, fast ADC with an I2C interface,
compatible with the LTC2309 (which has 8 channels).

This patch adds support for the LTC2305 by introducing a chip_info
structure to handle the different channel configurations between the two
variants. The LTC2305 exposes 2 single-ended channels and 2 differential
combinations.

Also updates the device tree bindings to include the lltc,ltc2305
compatible string and documents it in the Kconfig.

Carlos Jones Jr (3):
  iio: adc: ltc2309: introduce chip_info structure
  dt-bindings: iio: adc: lltc,ltc2497: add LTC2305 support
  iio: adc: ltc2309: add support for LTC2305

 .../bindings/iio/adc/lltc,ltc2497.yaml        |  9 +++-
 drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig                       |  6 +--
 drivers/iio/adc/ltc2309.c                     | 45 ++++++++++++++++---
 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)


base-commit: ff0843ceb1fb11a6b73e0e77b932ef7967aecd4b
-- 
2.43.0
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add support for LTC2305
Posted by Andy Shevchenko 2 weeks ago
On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 10:08:16PM +0800, Carlos Jones Jr wrote:
> The LTC2305 is a 2-channel, 12-bit, fast ADC with an I2C interface,
> compatible with the LTC2309 (which has 8 channels).
> 
> This patch adds support for the LTC2305 by introducing a chip_info
> structure to handle the different channel configurations between the two
> variants. The LTC2305 exposes 2 single-ended channels and 2 differential
> combinations.
> 
> Also updates the device tree bindings to include the lltc,ltc2305
> compatible string and documents it in the Kconfig.

There is nothing bad with the series, but hey, ADI, again telling you, deploy
the internal Wiki and put there most of the typical problems with the code
submitted by ADI! This series could be done just in one round, if you do this
and prevent wasting reviewers' time!


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko