drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
From: MalavyaRaval <malavyaraval@gmail.com>
Split long lines in rtw_sta_mgt.c to adhere to kernel coding style.
Signed-off-by: MalavyaRaval <malavyaraval@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c
index 9d222ae87d79..40a1dc9658c8 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c
@@ -54,7 +54,8 @@ u32 _rtw_init_sta_priv(struct sta_priv *pstapriv)
struct sta_info *psta;
s32 i;
- pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf = vzalloc(sizeof(struct sta_info) * NUM_STA + 4);
+ pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf = vzalloc(sizeof(*pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf) *
+ NUM_STA + 4);
if (!pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf)
return _FAIL;
@@ -105,7 +106,8 @@ u32 _rtw_init_sta_priv(struct sta_priv *pstapriv)
inline int rtw_stainfo_offset(struct sta_priv *stapriv, struct sta_info *sta)
{
- int offset = (((u8 *)sta) - stapriv->pstainfo_buf) / sizeof(struct sta_info);
+ int offset = (((u8 *)sta) - stapriv->pstainfo_buf) /
+ sizeof(struct sta_info);
return offset;
}
--
2.43.0
Hi Malavya, Thanks for the patch! I have a concern regarding the first hunk of this change: > - pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf = vzalloc(sizeof(struct sta_info) * NUM_STA + 4); > + pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf = vzalloc(sizeof(*pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf) * > + NUM_STA + 4); You've changed the logic from taking the size of 'struct sta_info' to the size of the dereferenced pointer '*pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf'. Firstly: In this driver, 'pallocated_stainfo_buf' is a u8 pointer. This means sizeof(*ptr) will return 1, whereas 'struct sta_info' is much larger. This will lead to a significantly smaller memory allocation than intended and cause a buffer overflow. If you want to use the preferred 'sizeof(*ptr)' style, you should use the pointer that actually represents the structure array, or stick to the original 'struct sta_info' and just wrap the line. Secondly: For a v2, when splitting the line, 'NUM_STA' should be vertically aligned with the start of the 'sizeof' expression on the line above. Right now, the indentation looks a bit off. Also, for a v2, please ensure your subject line starts with a lowercase letter after the prefix: "staging: rtl8723bs: break long lines..." Best regards, Luka Gejak
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.