[PATCH v2 05/13] wifi: mt76: mt7925: advertise EHT 320MHz capabilities for 6GHz band

Javier Tia posted 13 patches 2 weeks, 3 days ago
[PATCH v2 05/13] wifi: mt76: mt7925: advertise EHT 320MHz capabilities for 6GHz band
Posted by Javier Tia 2 weeks, 3 days ago
mt7925_init_eht_caps() only populates EHT MCS/NSS maps for BW <= 80
and BW = 160, but never sets BW = 320. This means iw phy shows no
320MHz MCS map entries even though the hardware supports 320MHz
operation in the 6GHz band.

Add the missing 320MHz capability bits for 6GHz, following the same
pattern as mt7996:
  - PHY_CAP0: IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP0_320MHZ_IN_6GHZ
  - PHY_CAP1: beamformee SS for 320MHz
  - PHY_CAP2: sounding dimensions for 320MHz
  - PHY_CAP6: MCS15 support for 320MHz width
  - PHY_CAP7: non-OFDMA UL MU-MIMO and MU beamformer for 320MHz
  - MCS/NSS: populate bw._320 maps for 6GHz band

Introduce is_320mhz_supported() as a generic capability check using the
mt7925 family ID. This avoids chip-specific references in common code,
and automatically extends to new chips once they join the
is_mt7925() family via chip ID helpers.

Tested-by: Marcin FM <marcin@lgic.pl>
Tested-by: Cristian-Florin Radoi <radoi.chris@gmail.com>
Tested-by: George Salukvadze <giosal90@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Evgeny Kapusta <3193631@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Samu Toljamo <samu.toljamo@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ariel Rosenfeld <ariel.rosenfeld.750@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Chapuis Dario <chapuisdario4@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Thibaut François <tibo@humeurlibre.fr>
Tested-by: 张旭涵 <Loong.0x00@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Javier Tia <floss@jetm.me>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac.h |  5 +++++
 drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac.h b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac.h
index 813d61bffc2c..554716e01ee6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac.h
@@ -177,6 +177,11 @@ static inline bool is_mt7925(struct mt76_dev *dev)
 	return mt76_chip(dev) == 0x7925;
 }
 
+static inline bool is_320mhz_supported(struct mt76_dev *dev)
+{
+	return is_mt7925(dev);
+}
+
 static inline bool is_mt7920(struct mt76_dev *dev)
 {
 	return mt76_chip(dev) == 0x7920;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c
index f128a198f81d..cd043ac266fb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c
@@ -183,6 +183,10 @@ mt7925_init_eht_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy, enum nl80211_band band,
 		IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP0_SU_BEAMFORMER |
 		IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP0_SU_BEAMFORMEE;
 
+	if (band == NL80211_BAND_6GHZ && is_320mhz_supported(&phy->dev->mt76))
+		eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[0] |=
+			IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP0_320MHZ_IN_6GHZ;
+
 	eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[0] |=
 		u8_encode_bits(u8_get_bits(sts - 1, BIT(0)),
 			       IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP0_BEAMFORMEE_SS_80MHZ_MASK);
@@ -193,10 +197,20 @@ mt7925_init_eht_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy, enum nl80211_band band,
 		u8_encode_bits(sts - 1,
 			       IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP1_BEAMFORMEE_SS_160MHZ_MASK);
 
+	if (band == NL80211_BAND_6GHZ && is_320mhz_supported(&phy->dev->mt76))
+		eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[1] |=
+			u8_encode_bits(sts - 1,
+				       IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP1_BEAMFORMEE_SS_320MHZ_MASK);
+
 	eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[2] =
 		u8_encode_bits(sts - 1, IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP2_SOUNDING_DIM_80MHZ_MASK) |
 		u8_encode_bits(sts - 1, IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP2_SOUNDING_DIM_160MHZ_MASK);
 
+	if (band == NL80211_BAND_6GHZ && is_320mhz_supported(&phy->dev->mt76))
+		eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[2] |=
+			u8_encode_bits(sts - 1,
+				       IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP2_SOUNDING_DIM_320MHZ_MASK);
+
 	eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[3] =
 		IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP3_NG_16_SU_FEEDBACK |
 		IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP3_NG_16_MU_FEEDBACK |
@@ -217,7 +231,8 @@ mt7925_init_eht_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy, enum nl80211_band band,
 		u8_encode_bits(u8_get_bits(0x11, GENMASK(1, 0)),
 			       IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP5_MAX_NUM_SUPP_EHT_LTF_MASK);
 
-	val = width == NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_160 ? 0x7 :
+	val = width == NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_320 ? 0xf :
+	      width == NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_160 ? 0x7 :
 	      width == NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_80 ? 0x3 : 0x1;
 	eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[6] =
 		u8_encode_bits(u8_get_bits(0x11, GENMASK(4, 2)),
@@ -230,6 +245,11 @@ mt7925_init_eht_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy, enum nl80211_band band,
 		IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP7_MU_BEAMFORMER_80MHZ |
 		IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP7_MU_BEAMFORMER_160MHZ;
 
+	if (band == NL80211_BAND_6GHZ && is_320mhz_supported(&phy->dev->mt76))
+		eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[7] |=
+			IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP7_NON_OFDMA_UL_MU_MIMO_320MHZ |
+			IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP7_MU_BEAMFORMER_320MHZ;
+
 	val = u8_encode_bits(nss, IEEE80211_EHT_MCS_NSS_RX) |
 	      u8_encode_bits(nss, IEEE80211_EHT_MCS_NSS_TX);
 
@@ -239,6 +259,12 @@ mt7925_init_eht_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy, enum nl80211_band band,
 	eht_nss->bw._160.rx_tx_mcs9_max_nss = val;
 	eht_nss->bw._160.rx_tx_mcs11_max_nss = val;
 	eht_nss->bw._160.rx_tx_mcs13_max_nss = val;
+
+	if (band == NL80211_BAND_6GHZ && is_320mhz_supported(&phy->dev->mt76)) {
+		eht_nss->bw._320.rx_tx_mcs9_max_nss = val;
+		eht_nss->bw._320.rx_tx_mcs11_max_nss = val;
+		eht_nss->bw._320.rx_tx_mcs13_max_nss = val;
+	}
 }
 
 int mt7925_init_mlo_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy)

-- 
2.53.0

Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] wifi: mt76: mt7925: advertise EHT 320MHz capabilities for 6GHz band
Posted by Sean Wang 1 week, 5 days ago
Hi,

On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 5:26 PM Javier Tia <floss@jetm.me> wrote:
>
> mt7925_init_eht_caps() only populates EHT MCS/NSS maps for BW <= 80
> and BW = 160, but never sets BW = 320. This means iw phy shows no
> 320MHz MCS map entries even though the hardware supports 320MHz
> operation in the 6GHz band.
>
> Add the missing 320MHz capability bits for 6GHz, following the same
> pattern as mt7996:
>   - PHY_CAP0: IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP0_320MHZ_IN_6GHZ
>   - PHY_CAP1: beamformee SS for 320MHz
>   - PHY_CAP2: sounding dimensions for 320MHz
>   - PHY_CAP6: MCS15 support for 320MHz width
>   - PHY_CAP7: non-OFDMA UL MU-MIMO and MU beamformer for 320MHz
>   - MCS/NSS: populate bw._320 maps for 6GHz band
>
> Introduce is_320mhz_supported() as a generic capability check using the
> mt7925 family ID. This avoids chip-specific references in common code,
> and automatically extends to new chips once they join the
> is_mt7925() family via chip ID helpers.
>
> Tested-by: Marcin FM <marcin@lgic.pl>
> Tested-by: Cristian-Florin Radoi <radoi.chris@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: George Salukvadze <giosal90@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Evgeny Kapusta <3193631@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Samu Toljamo <samu.toljamo@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Ariel Rosenfeld <ariel.rosenfeld.750@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Chapuis Dario <chapuisdario4@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Thibaut François <tibo@humeurlibre.fr>
> Tested-by: 张旭涵 <Loong.0x00@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Tia <floss@jetm.me>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac.h |  5 +++++
>  drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac.h b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac.h
> index 813d61bffc2c..554716e01ee6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac.h
> @@ -177,6 +177,11 @@ static inline bool is_mt7925(struct mt76_dev *dev)
>         return mt76_chip(dev) == 0x7925;
>  }
>
> +static inline bool is_320mhz_supported(struct mt76_dev *dev)
> +{
> +       return is_mt7925(dev);

I don't think this is correct for mt7925, and it will cause a
regression there. Was this tested on actual mt7925 hardware?

> +}
> +
>  static inline bool is_mt7920(struct mt76_dev *dev)
>  {
>         return mt76_chip(dev) == 0x7920;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c
> index f128a198f81d..cd043ac266fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c
> @@ -183,6 +183,10 @@ mt7925_init_eht_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy, enum nl80211_band band,
>                 IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP0_SU_BEAMFORMER |
>                 IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP0_SU_BEAMFORMEE;
>
> +       if (band == NL80211_BAND_6GHZ && is_320mhz_supported(&phy->dev->mt76))
> +               eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[0] |=
> +                       IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP0_320MHZ_IN_6GHZ;
> +
>         eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[0] |=
>                 u8_encode_bits(u8_get_bits(sts - 1, BIT(0)),
>                                IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP0_BEAMFORMEE_SS_80MHZ_MASK);
> @@ -193,10 +197,20 @@ mt7925_init_eht_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy, enum nl80211_band band,
>                 u8_encode_bits(sts - 1,
>                                IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP1_BEAMFORMEE_SS_160MHZ_MASK);
>
> +       if (band == NL80211_BAND_6GHZ && is_320mhz_supported(&phy->dev->mt76))
> +               eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[1] |=
> +                       u8_encode_bits(sts - 1,
> +                                      IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP1_BEAMFORMEE_SS_320MHZ_MASK);
> +
>         eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[2] =
>                 u8_encode_bits(sts - 1, IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP2_SOUNDING_DIM_80MHZ_MASK) |
>                 u8_encode_bits(sts - 1, IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP2_SOUNDING_DIM_160MHZ_MASK);
>
> +       if (band == NL80211_BAND_6GHZ && is_320mhz_supported(&phy->dev->mt76))
> +               eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[2] |=
> +                       u8_encode_bits(sts - 1,
> +                                      IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP2_SOUNDING_DIM_320MHZ_MASK);
> +
>         eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[3] =
>                 IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP3_NG_16_SU_FEEDBACK |
>                 IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP3_NG_16_MU_FEEDBACK |
> @@ -217,7 +231,8 @@ mt7925_init_eht_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy, enum nl80211_band band,
>                 u8_encode_bits(u8_get_bits(0x11, GENMASK(1, 0)),
>                                IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP5_MAX_NUM_SUPP_EHT_LTF_MASK);
>
> -       val = width == NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_160 ? 0x7 :
> +       val = width == NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_320 ? 0xf :
> +             width == NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_160 ? 0x7 :
>               width == NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_80 ? 0x3 : 0x1;
>         eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[6] =
>                 u8_encode_bits(u8_get_bits(0x11, GENMASK(4, 2)),
> @@ -230,6 +245,11 @@ mt7925_init_eht_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy, enum nl80211_band band,
>                 IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP7_MU_BEAMFORMER_80MHZ |
>                 IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP7_MU_BEAMFORMER_160MHZ;
>
> +       if (band == NL80211_BAND_6GHZ && is_320mhz_supported(&phy->dev->mt76))
> +               eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[7] |=
> +                       IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP7_NON_OFDMA_UL_MU_MIMO_320MHZ |
> +                       IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP7_MU_BEAMFORMER_320MHZ;
> +

I don't think this should be copied from mt7996 as-is for mt7927. I'd
suggest dropping the eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[7] change and keeping
it conservative for now.

>         val = u8_encode_bits(nss, IEEE80211_EHT_MCS_NSS_RX) |
>               u8_encode_bits(nss, IEEE80211_EHT_MCS_NSS_TX);
>
> @@ -239,6 +259,12 @@ mt7925_init_eht_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy, enum nl80211_band band,
>         eht_nss->bw._160.rx_tx_mcs9_max_nss = val;
>         eht_nss->bw._160.rx_tx_mcs11_max_nss = val;
>         eht_nss->bw._160.rx_tx_mcs13_max_nss = val;
> +
> +       if (band == NL80211_BAND_6GHZ && is_320mhz_supported(&phy->dev->mt76)) {
> +               eht_nss->bw._320.rx_tx_mcs9_max_nss = val;
> +               eht_nss->bw._320.rx_tx_mcs11_max_nss = val;
> +               eht_nss->bw._320.rx_tx_mcs13_max_nss = val;
> +       }
>  }
>
>  int mt7925_init_mlo_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy)
>
> --
> 2.53.0
>
>