[PATCH] ipvs: Move defense_work to system_dfl_long_wq

Ismael Luceno posted 1 patch 2 weeks, 6 days ago
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c | 6 +++---
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_est.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
[PATCH] ipvs: Move defense_work to system_dfl_long_wq
Posted by Ismael Luceno 2 weeks, 6 days ago
Under synflood conditions binding defense_work to system_long_wq may
pin it to a saturated CPU.

We've observed improved throughtput on a DPDK/VPP application with
this change. We attribute this to the reduced context switching.

The defense_work handler has no per-CPU data dependencies and no cache
locality requirements that would justify this.

Signed-off-by: Ismael Luceno <iluceno@suse.de>
---
Depends-on: wq/for-7.1 c116737e972e ("workqueue: Add system_dfl_long_wq for long unbound works")

 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c | 6 +++---
 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_est.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
index 35642de2a0fe..948ae5882a70 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ #define DEFENSE_TIMER_PERIOD	1*HZ
 	update_defense_level(ipvs);
 	if (atomic_read(&ipvs->dropentry))
 		ip_vs_random_dropentry(ipvs);
-	queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, &ipvs->defense_work,
+	queue_delayed_work(system_dfl_long_wq, &ipvs->defense_work,
 			   DEFENSE_TIMER_PERIOD);
 }
 #endif
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ #define DEFENSE_TIMER_PERIOD	1*HZ
 	atomic_set(&ipvs->est_genid_done, genid);
 
 	if (repeat)
-		queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, &ipvs->est_reload_work,
+		queue_delayed_work(system_dfl_long_wq, &ipvs->est_reload_work,
 				   delay);
 
 unlock:
@@ -4377,7 +4377,7 @@ do_ip_vs_get_ctl(struct sock *sk, int cmd, void __user *user, int *len)
 		goto err;
 
 	/* Schedule defense work */
-	queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, &ipvs->defense_work,
+	queue_delayed_work(system_dfl_long_wq, &ipvs->defense_work,
 			   DEFENSE_TIMER_PERIOD);
 
 	return 0;
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_est.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_est.c
index b17de33314da..454ea24828cc 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_est.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_est.c
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ #define pr_fmt(fmt) "IPVS: " fmt
 	ip_vs_est_stopped_recalc(ipvs);
 	/* Bump the kthread configuration genid */
 	atomic_inc(&ipvs->est_genid);
-	queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, &ipvs->est_reload_work, 0);
+	queue_delayed_work(system_dfl_long_wq, &ipvs->est_reload_work, 0);
 }
 
 /* Start kthread task with current configuration */
Re: [PATCH] ipvs: Move defense_work to system_dfl_long_wq
Posted by Simon Horman 2 weeks, 4 days ago
On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 03:00:59PM +0100, Ismael Luceno wrote:
> Under synflood conditions binding defense_work to system_long_wq may
> pin it to a saturated CPU.
> 
> We've observed improved throughtput on a DPDK/VPP application with
> this change. We attribute this to the reduced context switching.
> 
> The defense_work handler has no per-CPU data dependencies and no cache
> locality requirements that would justify this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ismael Luceno <iluceno@suse.de>
> ---
> Depends-on: wq/for-7.1 c116737e972e ("workqueue: Add system_dfl_long_wq for long unbound works")

Hi Ismael,

This patch seems suitable to be targeted at the nf-next tree.
That should be annotated like this:

Subject [PATCH nf-next] ipvs: ...

And the patch must compile when applied to it's target tree.
So you'll need to repost this patch once the dependency above
has reached that tree.