drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
There are a couple of typos in drbd_info and drbd_err messages.
Fix them.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
---
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
index 06d83b5ffafb..100207623182 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
@@ -8850,14 +8850,14 @@ static int receive_peer_dagtag(struct drbd_connection *connection, struct packet
strategy != SYNC_SOURCE_USE_BITMAP &&
strategy != SYNC_TARGET_USE_BITMAP) {
drbd_info(peer_device,
- "receive_peer_dagatg(): %s by rule=%s\n",
+ "receive_peer_dagtag(): %s by rule=%s\n",
strategy_descriptor(strategy).name,
drbd_sync_rule_str(rule));
goto out;
}
} else if (ps != strategy) {
drbd_err(peer_device,
- "receive_peer_dagatg(): Inconsistent resync directions %s %s\n",
+ "receive_peer_dagtag(): Inconsistent resync directions %s %s\n",
strategy_descriptor(strategy).name, strategy_descriptor(ps).name);
goto out;
}
--
2.53.0
On 3/16/26 2:25 PM, Colin Ian King wrote: > There are a couple of typos in drbd_info and drbd_err messages. > Fix them. Doesn't apply against for-next? -- Jens Axboe
Am 18.03.26 um 20:05 schrieb Jens Axboe: > On 3/16/26 2:25 PM, Colin Ian King wrote: >> There are a couple of typos in drbd_info and drbd_err messages. >> Fix them. > > Doesn't apply against for-next? > This is against the drbd-next tree, which is included in linux-next since a few days. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/Next/Trees#n267 I realize this is a bit awkward, since there is no way to really know which patches target linux-next and which block/for-next. Is there any specific way we could handle this to make it easier for you? -- Christoph Böhmwalder LINBIT | Keeping the Digital World Running DRBD HA — Disaster Recovery — Software defined Storage
On 3/18/26 3:13 PM, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote: > > > Am 18.03.26 um 20:05 schrieb Jens Axboe: >> On 3/16/26 2:25 PM, Colin Ian King wrote: >>> There are a couple of typos in drbd_info and drbd_err messages. >>> Fix them. >> >> Doesn't apply against for-next? >> > > This is against the drbd-next tree, which is included in linux-next > since a few days. > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/Next/Trees#n267 > > I realize this is a bit awkward, since there is no way to really know > which patches target linux-next and which block/for-next. > Is there any specific way we could handle this to make it easier for you? Yes, send the patches so they end up in the block tree rather than add another tree. -- Jens Axboe
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.