drivers/staging/greybus/bootrom.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
In gb_bootrom_get_firmware(), the 'fw' pointer could be NULL if the
function jumps to the 'unlock' label. The execution flow continues
into the 'queue_work' block where 'fw->size' is accessed, leading to
a null pointer dereference.
Fix this by adding a NULL check for 'fw' before accessing its members.
Signed-off-by: Oarora Etimis <OaroraEtimis@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/greybus/bootrom.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/bootrom.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/bootrom.c
index 83921d90c322..50c80475d241 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/greybus/bootrom.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/bootrom.c
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static int gb_bootrom_get_firmware(struct gb_operation *op)
queue_work:
/* Refresh timeout */
- if (!ret && (offset + size == fw->size))
+ if (!ret && fw && (offset + size == fw->size))
next_request = NEXT_REQ_READY_TO_BOOT;
else
next_request = NEXT_REQ_GET_FIRMWARE;
--
2.47.3
On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 02:20:28AM +0800, Oarora Etimis wrote: > In gb_bootrom_get_firmware(), the 'fw' pointer could be NULL if the > function jumps to the 'unlock' label. The execution flow continues > into the 'queue_work' block where 'fw->size' is accessed, leading to > a null pointer dereference. > > Fix this by adding a NULL check for 'fw' before accessing its members. > > Signed-off-by: Oarora Etimis <OaroraEtimis@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/staging/greybus/bootrom.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/bootrom.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/bootrom.c > index 83921d90c322..50c80475d241 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/bootrom.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/bootrom.c > @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static int gb_bootrom_get_firmware(struct gb_operation *op) > > queue_work: > /* Refresh timeout */ > - if (!ret && (offset + size == fw->size)) > + if (!ret && fw && (offset + size == fw->size)) Was this a static checker false positive? Which checker are you using? If fw is NULL then "ret" is a negative error code so the original code is fine. regards, dan carpenter > next_request = NEXT_REQ_READY_TO_BOOT; > else > next_request = NEXT_REQ_GET_FIRMWARE; > -- > 2.47.3 >
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.