Variables declared in probe() don't follow the reverse xmas
tree convention.

Fix the declaration in order to follow the convention.

Signed-off-by: Herve Codina (Schneider Electric) <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/watchdog/rzn1_wdt.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/rzn1_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/rzn1_wdt.c
index 96fd04fbc2a2..b7034eac91d0 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/rzn1_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/rzn1_wdt.c
@@ -101,10 +101,10 @@ static const struct watchdog_ops rzn1_wdt_ops = {
 static int rzn1_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
-	struct rzn1_watchdog *wdt;
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
-	struct clk *clk;
+	struct rzn1_watchdog *wdt;
 	unsigned long clk_rate;
+	struct clk *clk;
 	int ret;
 	int irq;
 
-- 
2.53.0

On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 10:24:14AM +0100, Herve Codina (Schneider Electric) wrote:
> Variables declared in probe() don't follow the reverse xmas
> tree convention.
> 
> Fix the declaration in order to follow the convention.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Herve Codina (Schneider Electric) <herve.codina@bootlin.com>

Not a fan of such changes. But it works and I am not opposing it:

Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>