mm/slub.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
kmem_cache_refill_sheaf() can fail in two slightly different ways.
During an in-place refill, some objects may already have been added
before the function returns -ENOMEM. On the other hand, if allocation of
a larger replacement sheaf fails, the original sheaf remains unchanged.
Update the comment to spell out both cases explicitly for clarity.
Signed-off-by: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>
---
mm/slub.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 11a99bd06ac7..8ae248b5b384 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -5005,14 +5005,23 @@ void kmem_cache_return_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp,
}
/*
- * refill a sheaf previously returned by kmem_cache_prefill_sheaf to at least
- * the given size
+ * Refill a sheaf previously returned by kmem_cache_prefill_sheaf to at least
+ * the given size.
*
- * the sheaf might be replaced by a new one when requesting more than
- * s->sheaf_capacity objects if such replacement is necessary, but the refill
- * fails (returning -ENOMEM), the existing sheaf is left intact
+ * On success, the sheaf will contain at least @size objects.
*
- * In practice we always refill to full sheaf's capacity.
+ * On failure, there are two cases:
+ *
+ * 1. If the requested size fits within the current sheaf's capacity, the
+ * refill is done in place. In that case, a failed refill may still fill
+ * some additional objects into the existing sheaf before returning -ENOMEM.
+ *
+ * 2. If the requested size exceeds the current sheaf's capacity, a new
+ * larger sheaf may be allocated to replace the original one. In that case,
+ * if allocation of the replacement sheaf fails, the original sheaf is left
+ * unchanged.
+ *
+ * In practice we usually refill to the sheaf's full capacity.
*/
int kmem_cache_refill_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp,
struct slab_sheaf **sheafp, unsigned int size)
--
2.50.1
On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 07:42:25PM +0800, Hao Li wrote: > kmem_cache_refill_sheaf() can fail in two slightly different ways. > During an in-place refill, some objects may already have been added > before the function returns -ENOMEM. On the other hand, if allocation of > a larger replacement sheaf fails, the original sheaf remains unchanged. > > Update the comment to spell out both cases explicitly for clarity. > > Signed-off-by: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev> > --- > > mm/slub.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c > index 11a99bd06ac7..8ae248b5b384 100644 > --- a/mm/slub.c > +++ b/mm/slub.c > @@ -5005,14 +5005,23 @@ void kmem_cache_return_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp, > } > > /* > - * refill a sheaf previously returned by kmem_cache_prefill_sheaf to at least > - * the given size > + * Refill a sheaf previously returned by kmem_cache_prefill_sheaf to at least > + * the given size. > * > - * the sheaf might be replaced by a new one when requesting more than > - * s->sheaf_capacity objects if such replacement is necessary, but the refill > - * fails (returning -ENOMEM), the existing sheaf is left intact > + * On success, the sheaf will contain at least @size objects. > * > - * In practice we always refill to full sheaf's capacity. > + * On failure, there are two cases: > + * > + * 1. If the requested size fits within the current sheaf's capacity, the > + * refill is done in place. In that case, a failed refill may still fill > + * some additional objects into the existing sheaf before returning -ENOMEM. > + * > + * 2. If the requested size exceeds the current sheaf's capacity, a new > + * larger sheaf may be allocated to replace the original one. In that case, > + * if allocation of the replacement sheaf fails, the original sheaf is left > + * unchanged. This is correct, but users of this API probably don't need to know the implementation in detail. I think it's fine to simply say the sheaf may have additional objects even on failure? > + * > + * In practice we usually refill to the sheaf's full capacity. > */ > int kmem_cache_refill_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp, > struct slab_sheaf **sheafp, unsigned int size) > -- > 2.50.1 > -- Cheers, Harry / Hyeonggon
On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 09:36:22PM +0900, Harry Yoo wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 07:42:25PM +0800, Hao Li wrote: > > kmem_cache_refill_sheaf() can fail in two slightly different ways. > > During an in-place refill, some objects may already have been added > > before the function returns -ENOMEM. On the other hand, if allocation of > > a larger replacement sheaf fails, the original sheaf remains unchanged. > > > > Update the comment to spell out both cases explicitly for clarity. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev> > > --- > > > > mm/slub.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c > > index 11a99bd06ac7..8ae248b5b384 100644 > > --- a/mm/slub.c > > +++ b/mm/slub.c > > @@ -5005,14 +5005,23 @@ void kmem_cache_return_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp, > > } > > > > /* > > - * refill a sheaf previously returned by kmem_cache_prefill_sheaf to at least > > - * the given size > > + * Refill a sheaf previously returned by kmem_cache_prefill_sheaf to at least > > + * the given size. > > * > > - * the sheaf might be replaced by a new one when requesting more than > > - * s->sheaf_capacity objects if such replacement is necessary, but the refill > > - * fails (returning -ENOMEM), the existing sheaf is left intact > > + * On success, the sheaf will contain at least @size objects. > > * > > - * In practice we always refill to full sheaf's capacity. > > + * On failure, there are two cases: > > + * > > + * 1. If the requested size fits within the current sheaf's capacity, the > > + * refill is done in place. In that case, a failed refill may still fill > > + * some additional objects into the existing sheaf before returning -ENOMEM. > > + * > > + * 2. If the requested size exceeds the current sheaf's capacity, a new > > + * larger sheaf may be allocated to replace the original one. In that case, > > + * if allocation of the replacement sheaf fails, the original sheaf is left > > + * unchanged. > > This is correct, but users of this API probably don't need to know the > implementation in detail. > > I think it's fine to simply say the sheaf may have additional objects even > on failure? That makes sense. Too much explanation could actually distract users. Thanks! > > > + * > > + * In practice we usually refill to the sheaf's full capacity. > > */ > > int kmem_cache_refill_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp, > > struct slab_sheaf **sheafp, unsigned int size) > > -- > > 2.50.1 > > > > -- > Cheers, > Harry / Hyeonggon
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.