The Iris block on SM8350 and SC8280XP is compatible with the Iris
(Venus) on SM8250. Document those two IP cores, using qcom,sm8250-venus
as a fallback compatible.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml
index 43a10d9f664e..3700f8fe91cc 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ maintainers:
- Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org>
description: |
- The Venus IP is a video encode and decode accelerator present
+ The Iris2 IP is a video encode and decode accelerator present
on Qualcomm platforms
allOf:
@@ -18,7 +18,13 @@ allOf:
properties:
compatible:
- const: qcom,sm8250-venus
+ oneOf:
+ - const: qcom,sm8250-venus
+ - items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,sc8280xp-iris
+ - qcom,sm8350-iris
+ - const: qcom,sm8250-venus
power-domains:
minItems: 2
--
2.47.3
On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > The Iris block on SM8350 and SC8280XP is compatible with the Iris > (Venus) on SM8250. Document those two IP cores, using qcom,sm8250-venus > as a fallback compatible. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml | 10 ++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml > index 43a10d9f664e..3700f8fe91cc 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml > @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ maintainers: > - Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org> > > description: | > - The Venus IP is a video encode and decode accelerator present > + The Iris2 IP is a video encode and decode accelerator present Why Venus name disappears? And why now this is Iris2, not Iris? It's the first time such name is used. Just call it Venus/Iris if the new devices renamed the block. Best regards, Krzysztof
On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 08:55:00AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > The Iris block on SM8350 and SC8280XP is compatible with the Iris > > (Venus) on SM8250. Document those two IP cores, using qcom,sm8250-venus > > as a fallback compatible. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml | 10 ++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml > > index 43a10d9f664e..3700f8fe91cc 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml > > @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ maintainers: > > - Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org> > > > > description: | > > - The Venus IP is a video encode and decode accelerator present > > + The Iris2 IP is a video encode and decode accelerator present > > Why Venus name disappears? And why now this is Iris2, not Iris? It's the > first time such name is used. Just call it Venus/Iris if the new devices > renamed the block. SM8150, SC8180X had Iris 1.xx. SM8250 and SC7280 have Iris 2.xx. But when the bindings were written, it seems, it wasn't obvious (or important enough). I will change this to Venus / Iris 2.xx -- With best wishes Dmitry
On 13/03/2026 09:14, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 08:55:00AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >>> The Iris block on SM8350 and SC8280XP is compatible with the Iris >>> (Venus) on SM8250. Document those two IP cores, using qcom,sm8250-venus >>> as a fallback compatible. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml | 10 ++++++++-- >>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml >>> index 43a10d9f664e..3700f8fe91cc 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml >>> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ maintainers: >>> - Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org> >>> >>> description: | >>> - The Venus IP is a video encode and decode accelerator present >>> + The Iris2 IP is a video encode and decode accelerator present >> >> Why Venus name disappears? And why now this is Iris2, not Iris? It's the >> first time such name is used. Just call it Venus/Iris if the new devices >> renamed the block. > > SM8150, SC8180X had Iris 1.xx. SM8250 and SC7280 have Iris 2.xx. But > when the bindings were written, it seems, it wasn't obvious (or > important enough). I will change this to Venus / Iris 2.xx Then "Iris v2.xx", how we call versions of blocks in all other cases. The block is simply Iris, not Iris2, right? Best regards, Krzysztof
On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 09:25:14AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 13/03/2026 09:14, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 08:55:00AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > >>> The Iris block on SM8350 and SC8280XP is compatible with the Iris > >>> (Venus) on SM8250. Document those two IP cores, using qcom,sm8250-venus > >>> as a fallback compatible. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com> > >>> --- > >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml | 10 ++++++++-- > >>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml > >>> index 43a10d9f664e..3700f8fe91cc 100644 > >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml > >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml > >>> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ maintainers: > >>> - Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org> > >>> > >>> description: | > >>> - The Venus IP is a video encode and decode accelerator present > >>> + The Iris2 IP is a video encode and decode accelerator present > >> > >> Why Venus name disappears? And why now this is Iris2, not Iris? It's the > >> first time such name is used. Just call it Venus/Iris if the new devices > >> renamed the block. > > > > SM8150, SC8180X had Iris 1.xx. SM8250 and SC7280 have Iris 2.xx. But > > when the bindings were written, it seems, it wasn't obvious (or > > important enough). I will change this to Venus / Iris 2.xx > > Then "Iris v2.xx", how we call versions of blocks in all other cases. > The block is simply Iris, not Iris2, right? Ack. -- With best wishes Dmitry
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.