[PATCH 06/61] 9p: Prefer IS_ERR_OR_NULL over manual NULL check

Philipp Hahn posted 61 patches 4 weeks, 1 day ago
[PATCH 06/61] 9p: Prefer IS_ERR_OR_NULL over manual NULL check
Posted by Philipp Hahn 4 weeks, 1 day ago
Prefer using IS_ERR_OR_NULL() over using IS_ERR() and a manual NULL
check.

Change generated with coccinelle.

To: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>
To: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>
To: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
To: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
Cc: v9fs@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Philipp Hahn <phahn-oss@avm.de>
---
 fs/9p/fid.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/9p/fid.h b/fs/9p/fid.h
index 0d6138bee2a3d1ab565ab2d210c0a3f3bf97e4e3..3bb7ef4380e972a2d9ab67eb4aab6cc5bfe2eea7 100644
--- a/fs/9p/fid.h
+++ b/fs/9p/fid.h
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static inline struct p9_fid *v9fs_fid_clone(struct dentry *dentry)
 	struct p9_fid *fid, *nfid;
 
 	fid = v9fs_fid_lookup(dentry);
-	if (!fid || IS_ERR(fid))
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fid))
 		return fid;
 
 	nfid = clone_fid(fid);

-- 
2.43.0
RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 06/61] 9p: Prefer IS_ERR_OR_NULL over manual NULL check
Posted by Loktionov, Aleksandr 4 weeks ago

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org> On Behalf
> Of Philipp Hahn
> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2026 12:49 PM
> To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com;
> bpf@vger.kernel.org; ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; cocci@inria.fr; dm-
> devel@lists.linux.dev; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org;
> gfs2@lists.linux.dev; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-wired-
> lan@lists.osuosl.org; iommu@lists.linux.dev; kvm@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-block@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org; linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> cifs@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> erofs@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> hyperv@vger.kernel.org; linux-input@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-leds@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> media@vger.kernel.org; linux-mips@vger.kernel.org; linux-mm@kvack.org;
> linux-modules@vger.kernel.org; linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> nfs@vger.kernel.org; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> phy@lists.infradead.org; linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> rockchip@lists.infradead.org; linux-s390@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> scsi@vger.kernel.org; linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org; linux-security-
> module@vger.kernel.org; linux-sh@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> sound@vger.kernel.org; linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com;
> linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-usb@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> wireless@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
> ntfs3@lists.linux.dev; samba-technical@lists.samba.org; sched-
> ext@lists.linux.dev; target-devel@vger.kernel.org; tipc-
> discussion@lists.sourceforge.net; v9fs@lists.linux.dev; Philipp Hahn
> <phahn-oss@avm.de>
> Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>; Latchesar Ionkov
> <lucho@ionkov.net>; Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>;
> Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 06/61] 9p: Prefer IS_ERR_OR_NULL
> over manual NULL check
> 
> Prefer using IS_ERR_OR_NULL() over using IS_ERR() and a manual NULL
> check.
> 
> Change generated with coccinelle.
> 
> To: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>
> To: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>
> To: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
> To: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
> Cc: v9fs@lists.linux.dev
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Hahn <phahn-oss@avm.de>
> ---
>  fs/9p/fid.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/9p/fid.h b/fs/9p/fid.h
> index
> 0d6138bee2a3d1ab565ab2d210c0a3f3bf97e4e3..3bb7ef4380e972a2d9ab67eb4aab
> 6cc5bfe2eea7 100644
> --- a/fs/9p/fid.h
> +++ b/fs/9p/fid.h
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static inline struct p9_fid *v9fs_fid_clone(struct
> dentry *dentry)
>  	struct p9_fid *fid, *nfid;
> 
>  	fid = v9fs_fid_lookup(dentry);
> -	if (!fid || IS_ERR(fid))
> +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fid))
>  		return fid;
> 
>  	nfid = clone_fid(fid);
> 
> --
> 2.43.0

Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
Re: [PATCH 06/61] 9p: Prefer IS_ERR_OR_NULL over manual NULL check
Posted by Christian Schoenebeck 4 weeks, 1 day ago
On Tuesday, 10 March 2026 12:48:32 CET Philipp Hahn wrote:
> Prefer using IS_ERR_OR_NULL() over using IS_ERR() and a manual NULL
> check.
> 
> Change generated with coccinelle.
> 
> To: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>
> To: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>
> To: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
> To: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
> Cc: v9fs@lists.linux.dev
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Hahn <phahn-oss@avm.de>
> ---
>  fs/9p/fid.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

"fs/9p" in the subject on this one, please, not just "9p".

Except of that:

Reviewed-by: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>

> diff --git a/fs/9p/fid.h b/fs/9p/fid.h
> index
> 0d6138bee2a3d1ab565ab2d210c0a3f3bf97e4e3..3bb7ef4380e972a2d9ab67eb4aab6cc5b
> fe2eea7 100644 --- a/fs/9p/fid.h
> +++ b/fs/9p/fid.h
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static inline struct p9_fid *v9fs_fid_clone(struct dentry
> *dentry) struct p9_fid *fid, *nfid;
> 
>  	fid = v9fs_fid_lookup(dentry);
> -	if (!fid || IS_ERR(fid))
> +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fid))
>  		return fid;
> 
>  	nfid = clone_fid(fid);