On 2026-03-10 11:49 am, Philipp Hahn wrote:
> Prefer using IS_ERR_OR_NULL() over using IS_ERR() and a manual NULL
> check.
AFAICS it doesn't look possible for the argument to be anything other
than valid at both callsites, so *both* conditions here seem in fact to
be entirely redundant.
> Change generated with coccinelle.
Please use coccinelle responsibly. Mechanical changes are great for
scripted API updates, but for cleanup, whilst it's ideal for *finding*
areas of code that are worth looking at, the code then wants actually
looking at, in its whole context, because meaningful cleanup often goes
deeper than trivial replacement.
In particular, anywhere IS_ERR_OR_NULL() is genuinely relevant is
usually a sign of bad interface design, so if you're looking at this
then you really should be looking first and foremost to remove any
checks that are already unnecessary, and for the remainder, to see if
the thing being checked can be improved to not mix the two different
styles. That would be constructive and (usually) welcome cleanup. Simply
churning a bunch of code with this ugly macro that's arguably less
readable than what it replaces, not so much.
Thanks,
Robin.
> To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
> To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Hahn <phahn-oss@avm.de>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c
> index 8231d7d6bb6a9202025643639a6b28e6faa84659..500a42b57a997696ff37c76f028a717ab71d01f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c
> @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static int omap_iommu_attach(struct omap_iommu *obj, u32 *iopgd)
> **/
> static void omap_iommu_detach(struct omap_iommu *obj)
> {
> - if (!obj || IS_ERR(obj))
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(obj))
> return;
>
> spin_lock(&obj->iommu_lock);
>