Signed-off-by: pcjer <pcj3195161583@163.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 1266d5452..8482a85d6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -1025,8 +1025,8 @@ static bool tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 
 			slot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn);
 			if (kvm_hugepage_test_mixed(slot, gfn, iter.level) ||
-			    (gfn & mask) < start ||
-			    end < (gfn & mask) + KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(iter.level)) {
+			    (gfn & ~mask) < start ||
+			    end < (gfn & ~mask) + KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(iter.level)) {
 				WARN_ON_ONCE(!can_yield);
 				if (split_sp) {
 					sp = split_sp;
-- 
2.43.0

On Mon, Mar 09, 2026, pcjer wrote:
> Signed-off-by: pcjer <pcj3195161583@163.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> index 1266d5452..8482a85d6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> @@ -1025,8 +1025,8 @@ static bool tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
>  
>  			slot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn);
>  			if (kvm_hugepage_test_mixed(slot, gfn, iter.level) ||
> -			    (gfn & mask) < start ||
> -			    end < (gfn & mask) + KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(iter.level)) {
> +			    (gfn & ~mask) < start ||
> +			    end < (gfn & ~mask) + KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(iter.level)) {

Somewhat to my surprise, this does indeed look like a legitimate fix, ignoring
that the code in question was never merged and was lasted posted 2+ years ago[*]
(and has long since been replaced).

The bug likely went unnoticed during development because "(gfn & mask) < start"
would almost always be true (mask == 511 for a 2MiB page).  Though mask should
really just be inverted from the get go in this code

+		if (is_private && kvm_gfn_shared_mask(kvm) &&
+		    is_large_pte(iter.old_spte)) {
+			gfn_t gfn = iter.gfn & ~kvm_gfn_shared_mask(kvm);
+			gfn_t mask = KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(iter.level) - 1;
+
+			struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
+			struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
+

[*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/c656573ccc68e212416d323d35f884bff25e6e2d.1708933624.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com

On 3/9/2026 10:23 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2026, pcjer wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: pcjer <pcj3195161583@163.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
>> index 1266d5452..8482a85d6 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
>> @@ -1025,8 +1025,8 @@ static bool tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
>>   
>>   			slot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn);
>>   			if (kvm_hugepage_test_mixed(slot, gfn, iter.level) ||
>> -			    (gfn & mask) < start ||
>> -			    end < (gfn & mask) + KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(iter.level)) {
>> +			    (gfn & ~mask) < start ||
>> +			    end < (gfn & ~mask) + KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(iter.level)) {
> 
> Somewhat to my surprise, this does indeed look like a legitimate fix, ignoring
> that the code in question was never merged and was lasted posted 2+ years ago[*]
> (and has long since been replaced).
> 
> The bug likely went unnoticed during development because "(gfn & mask) < start"
> would almost always be true (mask == 511 for a 2MiB page).  Though mask should
> really just be inverted from the get go in this code
> 
> +		if (is_private && kvm_gfn_shared_mask(kvm) &&
> +		    is_large_pte(iter.old_spte)) {
> +			gfn_t gfn = iter.gfn & ~kvm_gfn_shared_mask(kvm);
> +			gfn_t mask = KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(iter.level) - 1;
> +
> +			struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> +			struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
> +
> 
> [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/c656573ccc68e212416d323d35f884bff25e6e2d.1708933624.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com
> 

/faceplam, the buggy code was written by me.