On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 02:08:15PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> The suggestion of having the CX power domain tied up to the GCC
> controller started here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/fe210f0b-692b-4c45-afc4-fc2bc5e57854@oss.qualcomm.com/
>
> and then, for Glymur, it has been brought up here as well:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/0248dc51-1036-426c-b1de-dbc71696e2c1@oss.qualcomm.com/
>
> These plus a discussion off-list led to this patchset being done.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Dropped the required-opps property from both the schema and DT node.
> - Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260309-glymur-fix-gcc-cx-scaling-v1-0-f682c82f116f@oss.qualcomm.com
>
> ---
> Abel Vesa (3):
> dt-bindings: clock: qcom: glymur-gcc: Add missing CX power domain
> clk: qcom: gcc-glymur: Enable runtime PM
> arm64: dts: qcom: glymur: Tie up the CX power domain to GCC
One series in 24h, please. I've sent feedback to v1 before stumbling on
v2.
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,glymur-gcc.yaml | 8 ++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur.dtsi | 1 +
> drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-glymur.c | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> ---
> base-commit: a0ae2a256046c0c5d3778d1a194ff2e171f16e5f
> change-id: 20260309-glymur-fix-gcc-cx-scaling-a0b350cd5741
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry