From: Ed Tsai <ed.tsai@mediatek.com>
On some platforms, the VCC regulator has a slow ramp-up time. Add a
delay after enabling VCC to ensure voltage has fully stabilized before
we enable the clocks.
Signed-off-by: Ed Tsai <ed.tsai@mediatek.com>
---
drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 12 ++++++++++++
include/ufs/ufshcd.h | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index 899e663fea6e..bea72e7c1d32 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -9942,11 +9942,13 @@ static void ufshcd_vreg_set_lpm(struct ufs_hba *hba)
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
static int ufshcd_vreg_set_hpm(struct ufs_hba *hba)
{
+ bool vcc_on = false;
int ret = 0;
if (ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_poweroff(hba) && ufshcd_is_link_off(hba) &&
!hba->dev_info.is_lu_power_on_wp) {
ret = ufshcd_setup_vreg(hba, true);
+ vcc_on = true;
} else if (!ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_active(hba)) {
if (!ufshcd_is_link_active(hba)) {
ret = ufshcd_config_vreg_hpm(hba, hba->vreg_info.vccq);
@@ -9957,6 +9959,7 @@ static int ufshcd_vreg_set_hpm(struct ufs_hba *hba)
goto vccq_lpm;
}
ret = ufshcd_toggle_vreg(hba->dev, hba->vreg_info.vcc, true);
+ vcc_on = true;
}
goto out;
@@ -9965,6 +9968,15 @@ static int ufshcd_vreg_set_hpm(struct ufs_hba *hba)
vcc_disable:
ufshcd_toggle_vreg(hba->dev, hba->vreg_info.vcc, false);
out:
+ /*
+ * On platforms with a slow VCC ramp-up, a delay is needed after
+ * turning on VCC to ensure the voltage is stable before the
+ * reference clock is enabled.
+ */
+ if (hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_VCC_ON_DELAY && !ret && vcc_on &&
+ hba->vreg_info.vcc && !hba->vreg_info.vcc->always_on)
+ usleep_range(1000, 1100);
+
return ret;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
diff --git a/include/ufs/ufshcd.h b/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
index 8563b6648976..bf50078708b9 100644
--- a/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
+++ b/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
@@ -690,6 +690,12 @@ enum ufshcd_quirks {
* because it causes link startup to become unreliable.
*/
UFSHCD_QUIRK_PERFORM_LINK_STARTUP_ONCE = 1 << 26,
+
+ /*
+ * On some platforms, the VCC regulator has a slow ramp-up time. Add a
+ * delay after enable VCC to ensure it's stable.
+ */
+ UFSHCD_QUIRK_VCC_ON_DELAY = 1 << 27,
};
enum ufshcd_caps {
--
2.45.2
On 3/5/26 2:29 AM, ed.tsai@mediatek.com wrote: > On some platforms, the VCC regulator has a slow ramp-up time. Add a > delay after enabling VCC to ensure voltage has fully stabilized before > we enable the clocks. Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
On 3/5/26 2:29 AM, ed.tsai@mediatek.com wrote: > + /* > + * On platforms with a slow VCC ramp-up, a delay is needed after > + * turning on VCC to ensure the voltage is stable before the > + * reference clock is enabled. > + */ > + if (hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_VCC_ON_DELAY && !ret && vcc_on && > + hba->vreg_info.vcc && !hba->vreg_info.vcc->always_on) > + usleep_range(1000, 1100); Since the value of the delay is platform-dependent, has it been considered to introduce a new vendor operation (vop)? Thanks, Bart.
On Thu, 2026-03-05 at 06:24 -0600, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 3/5/26 2:29 AM, ed.tsai@mediatek.com wrote: > > + /* > > + * On platforms with a slow VCC ramp-up, a delay is needed > > after > > + * turning on VCC to ensure the voltage is stable before the > > + * reference clock is enabled. > > + */ > > + if (hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_VCC_ON_DELAY && !ret && vcc_on > > && > > + hba->vreg_info.vcc && !hba->vreg_info.vcc->always_on) > > + usleep_range(1000, 1100); > > Since the value of the delay is platform-dependent, has it been > considered to introduce a new vendor operation (vop)? > > Thanks, > > Bart. A vop does feel a bit heavyweight for a simple sleep. How about we add a new configurable variable, similar to the approach used for the VCC off delay? Best, Ed Tsai
On 3/5/26 6:19 PM, Ed Tsai (蔡宗軒) wrote: > On Thu, 2026-03-05 at 06:24 -0600, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> On 3/5/26 2:29 AM, ed.tsai@mediatek.com wrote: >>> + /* >>> + * On platforms with a slow VCC ramp-up, a delay is needed >>> after >>> + * turning on VCC to ensure the voltage is stable before the >>> + * reference clock is enabled. >>> + */ >>> + if (hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_VCC_ON_DELAY && !ret && vcc_on >>> && >>> + hba->vreg_info.vcc && !hba->vreg_info.vcc->always_on) >>> + usleep_range(1000, 1100); >> >> Since the value of the delay is platform-dependent, has it been >> considered to introduce a new vendor operation (vop)? > > A vop does feel a bit heavyweight for a simple sleep. How about we add > a new configurable variable, similar to the approach used for the VCC > off delay? Let's postpone introducing such a configuration variable until there is a real need for such a configuration variable. Bart.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.