[PATCH 4/4] arm64: defconfig: enable designware mipi csi-2 receiver

Michael Riesch via B4 Relay posted 4 patches 1 month ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH 4/4] arm64: defconfig: enable designware mipi csi-2 receiver
Posted by Michael Riesch via B4 Relay 1 month ago
From: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@collabora.com>

The Synopsys DesignWare MIPI CSI-2 Receiver is integrated into
recent Rockchip SoCs, such as the RK3568 and the RK3588.
Enable the driver for it in the default configuration.

Signed-off-by: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@collabora.com>
---
 arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
index b67d5b1fc45b..a93ff73ae52c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
@@ -907,6 +907,7 @@ CONFIG_SDR_PLATFORM_DRIVERS=y
 CONFIG_V4L_MEM2MEM_DRIVERS=y
 CONFIG_VIDEO_AMPHION_VPU=m
 CONFIG_VIDEO_CADENCE_CSI2RX=m
+CONFIG_VIDEO_DW_MIPI_CSI2RX=m
 CONFIG_VIDEO_MEDIATEK_JPEG=m
 CONFIG_VIDEO_MEDIATEK_VCODEC=m
 CONFIG_VIDEO_WAVE_VPU=m

-- 
2.39.5
Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: defconfig: enable designware mipi csi-2 receiver
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 1 month ago
On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 03:09:51PM +0100, Michael Riesch wrote:
> The Synopsys DesignWare MIPI CSI-2 Receiver is integrated into
> recent Rockchip SoCs, such as the RK3568 and the RK3588.

... and used on boards foo bar.

(becuse we take defconfig for boards, not for SoCs - if there is no
single board using it, then it should not be enabled because it means
you do it for downstream which simply does not exist for us).

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: defconfig: enable designware mipi csi-2 receiver
Posted by Michael Riesch 1 month ago
Hi Krzysztof,

On 3/7/26 16:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 03:09:51PM +0100, Michael Riesch wrote:
>> The Synopsys DesignWare MIPI CSI-2 Receiver is integrated into
>> recent Rockchip SoCs, such as the RK3568 and the RK3588.
> 
> ... and used on boards foo bar.

foo bar = pretty much any recent board with a Rockchip SoC on it...
(plus NXP users, as there is a series by Frank in the works)

> 
> (becuse we take defconfig for boards, not for SoCs - if there is no
> single board using it, then it should not be enabled because it means
> you do it for downstream which simply does not exist for us).

... but there is not yet a mainline example. Next item on my TODO list
is to send out basic RK3588 VICAP support including the device tree bits
for the Radxa ROCK 5B+ plus camera modules. Should I include the patch
in that series? Or wait until that series has been accepted? Or will you
just take my word for it that there will be plenty of boards using that
receiver in near future?

Best regards,
Michael
Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: defconfig: enable designware mipi csi-2 receiver
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 1 month ago
On 09/03/2026 10:02, Michael Riesch wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On 3/7/26 16:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 03:09:51PM +0100, Michael Riesch wrote:
>>> The Synopsys DesignWare MIPI CSI-2 Receiver is integrated into
>>> recent Rockchip SoCs, such as the RK3568 and the RK3588.
>>
>> ... and used on boards foo bar.
> 
> foo bar = pretty much any recent board with a Rockchip SoC on it...
> (plus NXP users, as there is a series by Frank in the works)
> 
>>
>> (becuse we take defconfig for boards, not for SoCs - if there is no
>> single board using it, then it should not be enabled because it means
>> you do it for downstream which simply does not exist for us).
> 
> ... but there is not yet a mainline example. Next item on my TODO list

Then why do we want it in the mainline? Answer: there is no reason.

We do not support downstream setups with mainline defconfigs.

> is to send out basic RK3588 VICAP support including the device tree bits
> for the Radxa ROCK 5B+ plus camera modules. Should I include the patch
> in that series? Or wait until that series has been accepted? Or will you
> just take my word for it that there will be plenty of boards using that
> receiver in near future?

Best regards,
Krzysztof