[PATCH v3 08/14] ASoC: dt-bindings: qcom,q6dsp-lpass-ports: Add Senary MI2S port

Srinivas Kandagatla posted 14 patches 1 month, 1 week ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v3 08/14] ASoC: dt-bindings: qcom,q6dsp-lpass-ports: Add Senary MI2S port
Posted by Srinivas Kandagatla 1 month, 1 week ago
From: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <mohammad.rafi.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>

Qualcomm platforms support the Senary MI2S interface for audio playback
and capture. Add a new definitions for the Senary MI2S RX and TX ports,
which are required for boards that utilize the Senary MI2S interface
for audio routing.

Signed-off-by: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <mohammad.rafi.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
 include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,q6dsp-lpass-ports.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,q6dsp-lpass-ports.h b/include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,q6dsp-lpass-ports.h
index e27a31ece1f2..45850f2d4342 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,q6dsp-lpass-ports.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,q6dsp-lpass-ports.h
@@ -150,6 +150,8 @@
 #define LPI_MI2S_TX_3		144
 #define LPI_MI2S_RX_4		145
 #define LPI_MI2S_TX_4		146
+#define SENARY_MI2S_RX		147
+#define SENARY_MI2S_TX		148
 
 #define LPASS_CLK_ID_PRI_MI2S_IBIT	1
 #define LPASS_CLK_ID_PRI_MI2S_EBIT	2
-- 
2.47.3
Re: [PATCH v3 08/14] ASoC: dt-bindings: qcom,q6dsp-lpass-ports: Add Senary MI2S port
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 1 month, 1 week ago
On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 01:07:06PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> From: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <mohammad.rafi.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>
> 
> Qualcomm platforms support the Senary MI2S interface for audio playback
> and capture. Add a new definitions for the Senary MI2S RX and TX ports,
> which are required for boards that utilize the Senary MI2S interface
> for audio routing.
> 

This should be squashed. Adding IDs in multiple patches is pointless -
it's one logical change. Plus patch is so trivial and obvious that even
preserving authorship cannot be used as an argument.

Best regards,
Krzysztof