drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
[ Upstream commit fcd7f96c783626c07ee3ed75fa3739a8a2052310 ]
Although it is guided that `#mbox-cells` must be at least 1, there are
many instances of `#mbox-cells = <0>;` in the device tree. If that is
the case and the corresponding mailbox controller does not provide
`fw_xlate` and of_xlate` function pointers, `of_mbox_index_xlate()` will
be used by default and out-of-bounds accesses could occur due to lack of
bounds check in that function.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Joonwon Kang <joonwonkang@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
[ changed sp->nargs to sp->args_count in the code and
fw_mbox_index_xlate() to of_mbox_index_xlate() in the commit message. ]
Signed-off-by: Joonwon Kang <joonwonkang@google.com>
---
drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c
index d3d26a2c9895..66cdadbd3d75 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c
@@ -498,12 +498,10 @@ static struct mbox_chan *
of_mbox_index_xlate(struct mbox_controller *mbox,
const struct of_phandle_args *sp)
{
- int ind = sp->args[0];
-
- if (ind >= mbox->num_chans)
+ if (sp->args_count < 1 || sp->args[0] >= mbox->num_chans)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
- return &mbox->chans[ind];
+ return &mbox->chans[sp->args[0]];
}
/**
--
2.53.0.473.g4a7958ca14-goog
On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 07:30:52AM +0000, Joonwon Kang wrote: > [ Upstream commit fcd7f96c783626c07ee3ed75fa3739a8a2052310 ] > > Although it is guided that `#mbox-cells` must be at least 1, there are > many instances of `#mbox-cells = <0>;` in the device tree. If that is > the case and the corresponding mailbox controller does not provide > `fw_xlate` and of_xlate` function pointers, `of_mbox_index_xlate()` will > be used by default and out-of-bounds accesses could occur due to lack of > bounds check in that function. > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Joonwon Kang <joonwonkang@google.com> > Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> > [ changed sp->nargs to sp->args_count in the code and > fw_mbox_index_xlate() to of_mbox_index_xlate() in the commit message. ] > Signed-off-by: Joonwon Kang <joonwonkang@google.com> > --- > drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) What kernel tree(s) is this for?
>> [ Upstream commit fcd7f96c783626c07ee3ed75fa3739a8a2052310 ] >> >> Although it is guided that `#mbox-cells` must be at least 1, there are >> many instances of `#mbox-cells = <0>;` in the device tree. If that is >> the case and the corresponding mailbox controller does not provide >> `fw_xlate` and of_xlate` function pointers, `of_mbox_index_xlate()` will >> be used by default and out-of-bounds accesses could occur due to lack of >> bounds check in that function. >> >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Joonwon Kang <joonwonkang@google.com> >> Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> >> [ changed sp->nargs to sp->args_count in the code and >> fw_mbox_index_xlate() to of_mbox_index_xlate() in the commit message. ] >> Signed-off-by: Joonwon Kang <joonwonkang@google.com> >> --- >> drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c | 6 ++---- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >What kernel tree(s) is this for? Sorry, please ignore this patch. I have specified the proper kernel tree in other patches. Thanks.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.