drivers/iio/proximity/rfd77402.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
In IRQ mode, the completion was being reinitialized after the
measurement command had already been sent to the hardware. This
created a race condition where the IRQ handler could call complete()
before reinit_completion() was executed. Consequently,
wait_for_completion_timeout() would fail to see the signal and wait
until it timed out.
Move reinit_completion() to occur before the measurement command is
triggered to ensure the synchronization primitive is ready to
capture the interrupt.
Fixes: dc81be96a73a ("iio: proximity: rfd77402: Add interrupt handling support")
Signed-off-by: Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
---
drivers/iio/proximity/rfd77402.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/rfd77402.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/rfd77402.c
index 6afdbfca3e5a..81b8daf17a54 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/proximity/rfd77402.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/rfd77402.c
@@ -173,10 +173,8 @@ static int rfd77402_wait_for_result(struct rfd77402_data *data)
struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
int val, ret;
- if (data->irq_en) {
- reinit_completion(&data->completion);
+ if (data->irq_en)
return rfd77402_wait_for_irq(data);
- }
/*
* As per RFD77402 datasheet section '3.1.1 Single Measure', the
@@ -204,6 +202,9 @@ static int rfd77402_measure(struct rfd77402_data *data)
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
+ if (data->irq_en)
+ reinit_completion(&data->completion);
+
ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, RFD77402_CMD_R,
RFD77402_CMD_SINGLE |
RFD77402_CMD_VALID);
---
base-commit: c025f6cf4209e1542ec2afebe49f42bbaf1a5c7b
change-id: 20260304-77402-ec479de1b9f6
Best regards,
--
Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 4, 2026 at 7:44 PM Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In IRQ mode, the completion was being reinitialized after the
> measurement command had already been sent to the hardware. This
> created a race condition where the IRQ handler could call complete()
> before reinit_completion() was executed. Consequently,
> wait_for_completion_timeout() would fail to see the signal and wait
> until it timed out.
>
> Move reinit_completion() to occur before the measurement command is
> triggered to ensure the synchronization primitive is ready to
> capture the interrupt.
>
> Fixes: dc81be96a73a ("iio: proximity: rfd77402: Add interrupt handling support")
> Signed-off-by: Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/proximity/rfd77402.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/rfd77402.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/rfd77402.c
> index 6afdbfca3e5a..81b8daf17a54 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/rfd77402.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/rfd77402.c
> @@ -173,10 +173,8 @@ static int rfd77402_wait_for_result(struct rfd77402_data *data)
> struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
> int val, ret;
>
> - if (data->irq_en) {
> - reinit_completion(&data->completion);
> + if (data->irq_en)
> return rfd77402_wait_for_irq(data);
> - }
>
> /*
> * As per RFD77402 datasheet section '3.1.1 Single Measure', the
> @@ -204,6 +202,9 @@ static int rfd77402_measure(struct rfd77402_data *data)
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> + if (data->irq_en)
> + reinit_completion(&data->completion);
> +
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Shrikant Raskar <raskar.shree97@gmail.com>
Regards,
Shrikant
On Mon, 9 Mar 2026 22:32:58 +0530
Shrikant <raskar.shree97@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2026 at 7:44 PM Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > In IRQ mode, the completion was being reinitialized after the
> > measurement command had already been sent to the hardware. This
> > created a race condition where the IRQ handler could call complete()
> > before reinit_completion() was executed. Consequently,
> > wait_for_completion_timeout() would fail to see the signal and wait
> > until it timed out.
> >
> > Move reinit_completion() to occur before the measurement command is
> > triggered to ensure the synchronization primitive is ready to
> > capture the interrupt.
> >
> > Fixes: dc81be96a73a ("iio: proximity: rfd77402: Add interrupt handling support")
> > Signed-off-by: Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/proximity/rfd77402.c | 7 ++++---
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/rfd77402.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/rfd77402.c
> > index 6afdbfca3e5a..81b8daf17a54 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/rfd77402.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/rfd77402.c
> > @@ -173,10 +173,8 @@ static int rfd77402_wait_for_result(struct rfd77402_data *data)
> > struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
> > int val, ret;
> >
> > - if (data->irq_en) {
> > - reinit_completion(&data->completion);
> > + if (data->irq_en)
> > return rfd77402_wait_for_irq(data);
> > - }
> >
> > /*
> > * As per RFD77402 datasheet section '3.1.1 Single Measure', the
> > @@ -204,6 +202,9 @@ static int rfd77402_measure(struct rfd77402_data *data)
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> >
> > + if (data->irq_en)
> > + reinit_completion(&data->completion);
> > +
> Looks good to me.
> Reviewed-by: Shrikant Raskar <raskar.shree97@gmail.com>
>
Applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git. Note I just sent a pull
request on that so will probably rebase after that (hopefully) gets
merged into char-misc-linus.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> Regards,
> Shrikant
On Wed, 04 Mar 2026 22:14:32 +0800
Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com> wrote:
> In IRQ mode, the completion was being reinitialized after the
> measurement command had already been sent to the hardware. This
> created a race condition where the IRQ handler could call complete()
> before reinit_completion() was executed. Consequently,
> wait_for_completion_timeout() would fail to see the signal and wait
> until it timed out.
>
> Move reinit_completion() to occur before the measurement command is
> triggered to ensure the synchronization primitive is ready to
> capture the interrupt.
>
> Fixes: dc81be96a73a ("iio: proximity: rfd77402: Add interrupt handling support")
> Signed-off-by: Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
Looks good to me. Shrikant, you know this driver better than I do so if you
can take a look as well that would be great.
Thanks,
J
> ---
> drivers/iio/proximity/rfd77402.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/rfd77402.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/rfd77402.c
> index 6afdbfca3e5a..81b8daf17a54 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/rfd77402.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/rfd77402.c
> @@ -173,10 +173,8 @@ static int rfd77402_wait_for_result(struct rfd77402_data *data)
> struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
> int val, ret;
>
> - if (data->irq_en) {
> - reinit_completion(&data->completion);
> + if (data->irq_en)
> return rfd77402_wait_for_irq(data);
> - }
>
> /*
> * As per RFD77402 datasheet section '3.1.1 Single Measure', the
> @@ -204,6 +202,9 @@ static int rfd77402_measure(struct rfd77402_data *data)
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> + if (data->irq_en)
> + reinit_completion(&data->completion);
> +
> ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, RFD77402_CMD_R,
> RFD77402_CMD_SINGLE |
> RFD77402_CMD_VALID);
>
> ---
> base-commit: c025f6cf4209e1542ec2afebe49f42bbaf1a5c7b
> change-id: 20260304-77402-ec479de1b9f6
>
> Best regards,
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.