[PATCH v2 6/7] dt-bindings: watchdog: Drop SMARC-sAM67 support

Michael Walle posted 7 patches 1 month, 1 week ago
[PATCH v2 6/7] dt-bindings: watchdog: Drop SMARC-sAM67 support
Posted by Michael Walle 1 month, 1 week ago
I was just informed that this product is discontinued (without being
ever released to the market). Pull the plug and let's not waste any more
maintainers time and revert commit 354f31e9d2a3 ("dt-bindings: watchdog:
Add SMARC-sAM67 support").

Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/kontron,sl28cpld-wdt.yaml | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/kontron,sl28cpld-wdt.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/kontron,sl28cpld-wdt.yaml
index 0821ba0e84a3..872a8471ef65 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/kontron,sl28cpld-wdt.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/kontron,sl28cpld-wdt.yaml
@@ -18,12 +18,7 @@ allOf:
 
 properties:
   compatible:
-    oneOf:
-      - items:
-          - enum:
-              - kontron,sa67mcu-wdt
-          - const: kontron,sl28cpld-wdt
-      - const: kontron,sl28cpld-wdt
+    const: kontron,sl28cpld-wdt
 
   reg:
     maxItems: 1
-- 
2.47.3
Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] dt-bindings: watchdog: Drop SMARC-sAM67 support
Posted by Guenter Roeck 1 month, 1 week ago
On 3/2/26 04:24, Michael Walle wrote:
> I was just informed that this product is discontinued (without being
> ever released to the market). Pull the plug and let's not waste any more
> maintainers time and revert commit 354f31e9d2a3 ("dt-bindings: watchdog:
> Add SMARC-sAM67 support").
> 
> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

> ---
>   .../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/kontron,sl28cpld-wdt.yaml | 7 +------
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/kontron,sl28cpld-wdt.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/kontron,sl28cpld-wdt.yaml
> index 0821ba0e84a3..872a8471ef65 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/kontron,sl28cpld-wdt.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/kontron,sl28cpld-wdt.yaml
> @@ -18,12 +18,7 @@ allOf:
>   
>   properties:
>     compatible:
> -    oneOf:
> -      - items:
> -          - enum:
> -              - kontron,sa67mcu-wdt
> -          - const: kontron,sl28cpld-wdt
> -      - const: kontron,sl28cpld-wdt
> +    const: kontron,sl28cpld-wdt
>   
>     reg:
>       maxItems: 1
Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] dt-bindings: watchdog: Drop SMARC-sAM67 support
Posted by Michael Walle 2 weeks, 3 days ago
Hi,

On Mon Mar 2, 2026 at 4:01 PM CET, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 3/2/26 04:24, Michael Walle wrote:
>> I was just informed that this product is discontinued (without being
>> ever released to the market). Pull the plug and let's not waste any more
>> maintainers time and revert commit 354f31e9d2a3 ("dt-bindings: watchdog:
>> Add SMARC-sAM67 support").
>> 
>> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Everything expect this patch was picked up. Guenter, do you want to
take it, or should it go through the TI SoC queue?

Thanks,
-michael
Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] dt-bindings: watchdog: Drop SMARC-sAM67 support
Posted by Guenter Roeck 2 weeks, 2 days ago
On 3/23/26 01:45, Michael Walle wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon Mar 2, 2026 at 4:01 PM CET, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 3/2/26 04:24, Michael Walle wrote:
>>> I was just informed that this product is discontinued (without being
>>> ever released to the market). Pull the plug and let's not waste any more
>>> maintainers time and revert commit 354f31e9d2a3 ("dt-bindings: watchdog:
>>> Add SMARC-sAM67 support").
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> 
> Everything expect this patch was picked up. Guenter, do you want to
> take it, or should it go through the TI SoC queue?
> 
> Thanks,
> -michael

I am fine with either approach. Wim handles all watchdog subsystem pull requests,
so we'll need his feedback.

Thanks,
Guenter