arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Enable DP83TG720 PHY driver as a module to support TI's DP83TG720
1000BASE-T1 Automotive Ethernet PHY. This is required for the
DP83TG720-IND-SPE-EVM daughter card used with AM642 EVM ICSSG0
interface.
Signed-off-by: Meghana Malladi <m-malladi@ti.com>
---
arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
index b67d5b1fc45b..3b88df2ca5e1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
@@ -420,6 +420,7 @@ CONFIG_REALTEK_PHY=y
CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_PHY=y
CONFIG_DP83867_PHY=y
CONFIG_DP83869_PHY=m
+CONFIG_DP83TG720_PHY=m
CONFIG_DP83TD510_PHY=y
CONFIG_VITESSE_PHY=y
CONFIG_XILINX_GMII2RGMII=m
base-commit: 4916f2e2f3fc9aef289fcd07949301e5c29094c2
prerequisite-patch-id: d9e4c1f3ec36250ae7ce49b720614eef25f9ffd3
--
2.43.0
On 26/02/2026 19:54, Meghana Malladi wrote: > Enable DP83TG720 PHY driver as a module to support TI's DP83TG720 > 1000BASE-T1 Automotive Ethernet PHY. This is required for the > DP83TG720-IND-SPE-EVM daughter card used with AM642 EVM ICSSG0 > interface. Grepping for DP83TG720 or IND-SPE-EVM gives me no results. Are you sure this is the board supported upstream? > > Signed-off-by: Meghana Malladi <m-malladi@ti.com> > --- > arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > index b67d5b1fc45b..3b88df2ca5e1 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > @@ -420,6 +420,7 @@ CONFIG_REALTEK_PHY=y > CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_PHY=y > CONFIG_DP83867_PHY=y > CONFIG_DP83869_PHY=m > +CONFIG_DP83TG720_PHY=m > CONFIG_DP83TD510_PHY=y > CONFIG_VITESSE_PHY=y > CONFIG_XILINX_GMII2RGMII=m > > base-commit: 4916f2e2f3fc9aef289fcd07949301e5c29094c2 > prerequisite-patch-id: d9e4c1f3ec36250ae7ce49b720614eef25f9ffd3 Why do you have dependencies in defconfig? Best regards, Krzysztof
On 2/27/26 12:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 26/02/2026 19:54, Meghana Malladi wrote: >> Enable DP83TG720 PHY driver as a module to support TI's DP83TG720 >> 1000BASE-T1 Automotive Ethernet PHY. This is required for the >> DP83TG720-IND-SPE-EVM daughter card used with AM642 EVM ICSSG0 >> interface. > > Grepping for DP83TG720 or IND-SPE-EVM gives me no results. Are you sure > this is the board supported upstream? > Yes, this series adds support adds support for the board: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231212054144.87527-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de/ >> >> Signed-off-by: Meghana Malladi <m-malladi@ti.com> >> --- >> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >> index b67d5b1fc45b..3b88df2ca5e1 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >> @@ -420,6 +420,7 @@ CONFIG_REALTEK_PHY=y >> CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_PHY=y >> CONFIG_DP83867_PHY=y >> CONFIG_DP83869_PHY=m >> +CONFIG_DP83TG720_PHY=m >> CONFIG_DP83TD510_PHY=y >> CONFIG_VITESSE_PHY=y >> CONFIG_XILINX_GMII2RGMII=m >> >> base-commit: 4916f2e2f3fc9aef289fcd07949301e5c29094c2 >> prerequisite-patch-id: d9e4c1f3ec36250ae7ce49b720614eef25f9ffd3 > > Why do you have dependencies in defconfig? > You're right - the prerequisite-patch-id line shouldn't be in the defconfig patch. The defconfig change itself has no code dependencies; it simply enables an already-upstream PHY driver as a module. Will fix this in v2. Thanks. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
On 27/02/2026 08:15, Meghana Malladi wrote: > > > On 2/27/26 12:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 26/02/2026 19:54, Meghana Malladi wrote: >>> Enable DP83TG720 PHY driver as a module to support TI's DP83TG720 >>> 1000BASE-T1 Automotive Ethernet PHY. This is required for the >>> DP83TG720-IND-SPE-EVM daughter card used with AM642 EVM ICSSG0 >>> interface. >> >> Grepping for DP83TG720 or IND-SPE-EVM gives me no results. Are you sure >> this is the board supported upstream? >> > > Yes, this series adds support adds support for the board: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231212054144.87527-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de/ I still wonder why there is no DTS for this. Best regards, Krzysztof
On 2/27/26 12:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 27/02/2026 08:15, Meghana Malladi wrote: >> >> >> On 2/27/26 12:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 26/02/2026 19:54, Meghana Malladi wrote: >>>> Enable DP83TG720 PHY driver as a module to support TI's DP83TG720 >>>> 1000BASE-T1 Automotive Ethernet PHY. This is required for the >>>> DP83TG720-IND-SPE-EVM daughter card used with AM642 EVM ICSSG0 >>>> interface. >>> >>> Grepping for DP83TG720 or IND-SPE-EVM gives me no results. Are you sure >>> this is the board supported upstream? >>> >> >> Yes, this series adds support adds support for the board: >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231212054144.87527-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de/ > > I still wonder why there is no DTS for this. > I posted DTS patch separately for this: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260226115454.1730618-1-m-malladi@ti.com/ Does it make more sense to post them together as a series ? > Best regards, > Krzysztof
On 27/02/2026 08:24, Meghana Malladi wrote: > > > On 2/27/26 12:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 27/02/2026 08:15, Meghana Malladi wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 2/27/26 12:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> On 26/02/2026 19:54, Meghana Malladi wrote: >>>>> Enable DP83TG720 PHY driver as a module to support TI's DP83TG720 >>>>> 1000BASE-T1 Automotive Ethernet PHY. This is required for the >>>>> DP83TG720-IND-SPE-EVM daughter card used with AM642 EVM ICSSG0 >>>>> interface. >>>> >>>> Grepping for DP83TG720 or IND-SPE-EVM gives me no results. Are you sure >>>> this is the board supported upstream? >>>> >>> >>> Yes, this series adds support adds support for the board: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231212054144.87527-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de/ >> >> I still wonder why there is no DTS for this. >> > > I posted DTS patch separately for this: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260226115454.1730618-1-m-malladi@ti.com/ > > Does it make more sense to post them together as a series ? Of course, you target the same subsystem - soc. Why triggering all these investigations and questions... Best regards, Krzysztof
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.