This series adds DTS and defconfig support for the eMMC controller
on Black Sesame Technologies C1200 SoC, split from the v5 MMC series [1].

The MMC driver patches (dt-bindings, sdhci bounce buffer, BST SDHCI driver,
and MAINTAINERS update) have been applied to mmc-next by Ulf Hansson [2].
These remaining DTS and defconfig patches are submitted to the SoC tree.

Changes since v5:
- Patch 2 (defconfig): fix CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_BST ordering to match Kconfig
  position (between CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_TEGRA and CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_F_SDH30),
  as pointed out by Krzysztof Kozlowski. Confirmed via savedefconfig.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260123095342.272505-1-yangzh0906@thundersoft.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAPDyKFrcXFAiYouOpjDx3NN-xWACU9jAzEfTU2m_-yvQ9SpC_A@mail.gmail.com/

Albert Yang (2):
  arm64: dts: bst: enable eMMC controller in C1200 CDCU1.0 board
  arm64: defconfig: enable BST SDHCI controller

 .../dts/bst/bstc1200-cdcu1.0-adas_4c2g.dts    | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/bst/bstc1200.dtsi         | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/configs/defconfig                  |  1 +
 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+)


base-commit: 0f61b1860cc3f52aef9036d7235ed1f017632193
-- 
2.43.0

On 25/02/2026 11:06, Albert Yang wrote:
> This series adds DTS and defconfig support for the eMMC controller
> on Black Sesame Technologies C1200 SoC, split from the v5 MMC series [1].
> 
> The MMC driver patches (dt-bindings, sdhci bounce buffer, BST SDHCI driver,
> and MAINTAINERS update) have been applied to mmc-next by Ulf Hansson [2].
> These remaining DTS and defconfig patches are submitted to the SoC tree.
> 
> Changes since v5:
> - Patch 2 (defconfig): fix CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_BST ordering to match Kconfig
>   position (between CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_TEGRA and CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_F_SDH30),
>   as pointed out by Krzysztof Kozlowski. Confirmed via savedefconfig.
> 

Please do not send patches to soc@ for review. It is explicitly
documented - read:

"The main SoC maintainers can be reached via the alias soc@kernel.org
only in following cases:

1. There are no platform-specific maintainers."

So are you claiming now that BST is unmaintained? Because if so, we will
mark it for removal.

First you send patches for review to the mailing lists. Only then,
AFTER THE REVIEW, you send them to soc@ list.

Please read maintainer soc profile.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

On Sun, 01 Mar 2026 14:12:03 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
 
> Please do not send patches to soc@ for review. It is explicitly
> documented - read:
> 
> "The main SoC maintainers can be reached via the alias soc@kernel.org
> only in following cases:
> 
> 1. There are no platform-specific maintainers."
> 
> So are you claiming now that BST is unmaintained? Because if so, we will
> mark it for removal.
> 
> First you send patches for review to the mailing lists. Only then,
> AFTER THE REVIEW, you send them to soc@ list.
> 
> Please read maintainer soc profile.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Understood. BST is maintained. Will resend v7 to the lists for review
first, without soc@.

Best regards,
Albert